Need clarity on discriminant (1 Viewer)

Joshmosh2

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
181
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Let me get this clear
If I get an equation, factored somewhere along the line of
2(m-2)x^2+...
When using discriminant or any other formulas in general, do you take into account the inside term, or the entire part?
Thinking about it, technically, the 'a' in ax^2 should include the entire 2(m-2) but it's so tempting just to use the (m-2) hehe
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Let me get this clear
If I get an equation, factored somewhere along the line of
2(m-2)x^2+...
When using discriminant or any other formulas in general, do you take into account the inside term, or the entire part?
Thinking about it, technically, the 'a' in ax^2 should include the entire 2(m-2) but it's so tempting just to use the (m-2) hehe
I really don't see how?
 

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Let me get this clear
If I get an equation, factored somewhere along the line of
2(m-2)x^2+...
When using discriminant or any other formulas in general, do you take into account the inside term, or the entire part?
Thinking about it, technically, the 'a' in ax^2 should include the entire 2(m-2) but it's so tempting just to use the (m-2) hehe
Your equation is not factored. Only the coefficient of x^2 is factored.

Why would it be remotely tempting to do something you know is wrong?
If you want to divide all terms by 2 .... with regard to determining the nature of the roots (and not actually solving the equation), the logic would still work. But then you can't claim to be using the discriminant ..... unless you want to call it Δ/4.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top