But then.. Damn so I do have to p.f. it don't I haha
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But then.. Damn so I do have to p.f. it don't I haha
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've got a formula here for the normal vector to the surface:
<Fx(xo,yo), Fy(xo,yo), -1>
but then somewhere else I see them using this:
<-Fx(xo,yo), -Fy(xo,yo), 1>
Which one is correct?
I'm not sure what they want me to enter here. All results I get decimals, after finding the derivative of that integral.
A bit lost in how to incorporate the nominal rate here. Need help with setting up the relevant ODE. I have a formula to find the effective rate for continuous compounding but it's taught in ACTL and not MATH.
Lol they made us solve this differential equation by considering how it is an exact ODE. But the solution y=Ax just bugs me... is there a shorter way to doing this one haha
This is boring and tiring. What is the giveaway as to what values of p and q I am supposed to pick.
Last edited by Paradoxica; 10 Aug 2016 at 9:39 PM.
If I am a conic section, then my e = ∞
Just so we don't have this discussion in the future, my definition of the natural numbers includes 0.
If I am a conic section, then my e = ∞
Just so we don't have this discussion in the future, my definition of the natural numbers includes 0.
I can't identify the type of this one...
...unless I did my partial derivatives wrong
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks