lazseeker v actual (1 Viewer)

[chait]

how does the estimate and the actual uai compare?



--------------
http://www.boredofstudies.org/results.html
http://www.boredofstudies.org/results.html http://www.boredofstudies.org/results.html

 

[flyin']

off by 0.25 after using it this morning with percentiles ...

 

[wogboy]

Lazseeker (using HSC marks) = 96.80
Lazseeker (using percentile bands) = 95.30
My actual UAI = 95.00

 

[Ultimate]

Originally posted by flyin'
off by 0.25 after using it this morning with percentiles ...

higher or lower than the UAI you achieved?

 

[tweakin]

it was off by 4 marks for me

 

[activist]

It was right and wrong, hard to explain. It gave me an aggregate somewhere in the 470s which it says is 100 but i got 99.95. Reading the uac report you need 483.2 to get 100 so it was close enough in terms of aggregate mark.

 

[GJ_JOE]

the estimate was 5 higher than what i actually got

 

[hornet]

Lazseeker HSC: 96.30
Lazseeker percentiles: 93 to 91.50 (depending on my harshness - 93 is exactly my percentile, 91.50 was to contain my expectations of today)

Real UAI: 94.50

luvin it. cheers lazseeker

 

[quartic]

Well Lazseeker turned out pretty accurate with percentiles if it was used intelligently (i.e. a good estimate of percentages based off stats from 2001 and 2002). with perhaps slightly conservative percentages Lazseeker predicted 99.35 for me and I got 99.6. Pretty close. With HSC marks Lazseeker gave me 99.95, too bad that wasn't true.

 

[blake]

Laz HSC Marks was 15 points off.
Laz Percentiles was 3 points off.
Extremely pissed off.

 

[kini mini]

with marks: 100 (agg 479.xx)
with guessing of percentiles last night b4 UAI: 99.80
actual:99.85

I guessed my percentiles fairly well, seems some people were way off or there was a dramatic scaling change?

 

[Butterfly_Wings]

I was fairly conservative with my percentages, and it predicted 1.6 under my actual UAI...so had I been a bit kinder to myself, it probably would have been pretty spot on.

 

[Minai]

I dont think I quite did the percentiles right, cos I predicted 92.xx that way, and ended up actually getting 95.25

 

[utopian731]

0.65 off

although, i had to sue french extension instead of latin extension, because latin extension wasnt there

 

[kini mini]

Originally posted by utopian731
0.65 off

although, i had to sue french extension instead of latin extension, because latin extension wasnt there

Bah how dare you use French for that

 

[kini mini]

Originally posted by Bon
kini mini, I'm assuming most people weren't too accurate with their guesses of percentiles.

Yeah, I get the feeling some ppl were very optimistic.

 

[alys]

i never got around to doing lazseeker using percentiles. however:

lazseeker (just the normal one, with marks) = 99.60
my uai = 99.60

well done lazseeker. i know it's just a fluke, based on my subjects (4u maths, 4u english, 3u french, modern), but it made me laugh. after i got over the shock (of getting that uai, that is, not the shock of lazseeker being right).

 

[utopian731]

Originally posted by kini mini


Bah how dare you use French for that

Yeh i know, its so much shitter than latin

 

[SaveFerris]

LazSeeker - 98.55

Actual - 98.55

Three cheers for LazSeeker!

 

[saladsurgery]

lazseeker with marks: 98.90
lazseeker with percentiles: sorry, i'm lazy
actual: 97.95

so that's not too bad.

oh, and a cookie remembering if you've agreed to the terms and conditions would be handy, so you've only got to read (or quickly scroll thru ) them once