Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: scaling

  1. #1
    Junior Member 1729's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    HSC
    2018
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    174
    Rep Power
    2

    scaling

    on rawmarks.info it says that for engineering studies in 2013 an 80 aligned to 95. how is this possible considering engineering doesnt have the best scaling (in terms of the difference between aligning and scaling)?

  2. #2
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    HSC
    2019
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    1

    Re: scaling

    I don't know about scaling of engineering studies. But the alignment is of your actual HSC exam not your internals. So getting 80/100 in your HSC EXAM (external) will give you about 95. I would not trust the information as it is of 2013.

  3. #3
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    HSC
    2019
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    1

    Re: scaling

    UAC take your aligned mark and turn into a scaled mark. For engineering studies I am pretty sure a 95 will turn into like a 90 as a scaled mark. But remember the HSC mark that you get is an aligned mark. So when you put your scores in atar calculator its the aligned mark.

  4. #4
    Cadet
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    HSC
    2018
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    28
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: scaling

    Quote Originally Posted by 1729 View Post
    on rawmarks.info it says that for engineering studies in 2013 an 80 aligned to 95. how is this possible considering engineering doesnt have the best scaling (in terms of the difference between aligning and scaling)?
    Aligning is the RAW band cutoffs, scaling as far as I know is completely independent of this. Scaling depends on the entire NSW cohort and how they perform in that subjects vs other subjects, i.e. how much it will count towards your aggregate

    For example Maths Extension 2 SCALES really well as the cohort is considered to be full of "smart" people who tend to perform really well on all their other subjects. This is used to determine that it must be a really hard subject and so it scales well.
    Last edited by Drdusk; 3 Sep 2018 at 5:43 PM.
    2018 HSC!!
    English | Maths Ext 1 | Maths Ext 2 | Physics | Software Design and Development | IPT

    ATAR aim: 96+ (Advanced Science(Physics) and Comp Sci UNSW)

  5. #5
    Junior Member 1729's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    HSC
    2018
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    174
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: scaling

    Quote Originally Posted by RhythmKnight View Post
    I don't know about scaling of engineering studies. But the alignment is of your actual HSC exam not your internals. So getting 80/100 in your HSC EXAM (external) will give you about 95. I would not trust the information as it is of 2013.
    so why is the aligning for engineering so good but the scaling so bad?

  6. #6
    Cadet
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    HSC
    2018
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    28
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: scaling

    Quote Originally Posted by 1729 View Post
    so why is the aligning for engineering so good but the scaling so bad?
    I guess what that means it that the entire NSW cohort for engineering studies is probably not that strong, as opposed to physics for example. Hence they don't scale it up as much. Aligning seems good as while it may be a challenging course and so the band 6 people are deemed to be performing at that level, it may not as challenging as a lot of the other subjects out there. Hence suggesting the cohort itself may be weaker as they are unable to perform well compared to the other subjects.

    I can relate as I do SDD which has above average scaling. While the aligning is good, a lot of the "dropkicks" take it as they think its just games all day, hence dragging down its scaling.
    2018 HSC!!
    English | Maths Ext 1 | Maths Ext 2 | Physics | Software Design and Development | IPT

    ATAR aim: 96+ (Advanced Science(Physics) and Comp Sci UNSW)

  7. #7
    Junior Member 1729's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    HSC
    2018
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    174
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: scaling

    Quote Originally Posted by Drdusk View Post
    I guess what that means it that the entire NSW cohort for engineering studies is probably not that strong, as opposed to physics for example. Hence they don't scale it up as much. Aligning seems good as while it may be a challenging course and so the band 6 people are deemed to be performing at that level, it may not as challenging as a lot of the other subjects out there. Hence suggesting the cohort itself may be weaker as they are unable to perform well compared to the other subjects.

    I can relate as I do SDD which has above average scaling. While the aligning is good, a lot of the "dropkicks" take it as they think its just games all day, hence dragging down its scaling.
    im confused. engineering is one of the hardest subjects in the hsc mainly because the syllabus is so broad and they can ask you almost anything, therefore making it hard to score a high raw mark. is this why the aligning is really good?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •