I didn't do it but I heard from 2 others that it is (3sqrt2-4)/2
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Your answer for part iii for the last question may be invalid, cuz it was asking for distinct and real. I did it by letting alpha be real, since one root has to be real, since its a cubic, then let beta and gamma be conjugate pairs, from real co-efficients, and when I ended with a contradiction, that meant that their all real. you can also prove distinct by assuming there's a double root, subbing it back into the equation, and showing that its not equal to 0, showing that there's no double root and hence all distinct.
English Advanced - Mathematics Extension 1 - Mathematics Extension 2 - Physics - Chemistry - Music 2 - Music Extension
if u let it be imaginary LHS is less then zero. let "a" be real , B=x+iy, Y=x-iy
( ((a-x)+iy) * ((a-x)-iy) )^2 * (2iy)^2 <0
as 2iy creates negative number so the whole thing becomes negative, first two terms are not negative so it still matches the condition for having real and distinct roots.
but i accounted for that in the exam thou but i forgot to put it there
Last edited by mrbunton; 25 Oct 2018 at 7:03 PM.
What do you all think the cutoff for a 95 aligned will be?
Omggg everyone has already typed so muchhh xP
That was arguably harder than last years, muuuuuuch harder!! OMG Q16 LEGIT GETTING 4/15 MAX D: Only got the induction lmao, fuck the geometry and poly is my WORST TOPIC D:
Overall I reckon like MC = ~6-7, Q11 = 14, Q12 = 14, Q13 = 14, Q14 = ~11-12, Q15 = ~12, Q16 = ~4 so I'm hoping >70+, 75 raw would be <3 <3
I'm glad I could get the conics, mechanics and graphing q's because those are my better topics c:
HSC 2018
Maths Ext 1 - Maths Ext 2 - English Adv - Physics - Chemistry
ATAR Goal - 96.00 - B Laws at UTS (Screw 99.00 lmao)
Yea i don't know, l do think it was a harder paper then 2017, but it wasn't one of the harder papers where high 60s scale to E4.
Hopefully E4 is around low to mid 70s.
Anybody agree?
Don't worry guys it was definitely harder than last year's paper. Hoping for a mark that can be aligned to 85 (don't think I got the E4 haha). I found this better than the trials though surprisingly. I'm sure EVERYONE on here went great!
Last edited by gallen88; 25 Oct 2018 at 7:29 PM.
i think i would of really enjoyed this paper if I didn't have my future at stake.
Honestly thought it was okay, up until Q16
I am fairly confident I knew how to do basically everything up to Q16, but sorta ran out of time on a few. Honestly feel like I'll be lucky to make like 3/15 on Q16 , but the rest was fairly okay.
Barring silly mistakes, hopefully ~75 raw...?
Anyone wanna guess at E4 cutoff... Really hoping for low 70's...
HSC 2018: 3U | 4U | Chemistry | Physics | Advanced English |
ATAR Goal: 95.00+ (98 ideal)
2018 HSC!!
English | Maths Ext 1 | Maths Ext 2 | Physics | Software Design and Development | IPT
ATAR aim: 96+ (Advanced Science(Physics Honours) and Comp Sci) @ UNSW
this year’s exam was pretty brutal:
- last 3 multiple choice were a little tricky and weird, but nothing too crazy
- questions 11-14 were pretty tame, nothing too out there
- questions 15 and 16 started throwing some hard ones out, with only a few easy ones - including that sin8θ expansion which was just a time waster really and the induction, however last parts of questions were killers
- minimising angle POQ’ needed a fair bit of algebra, and recognising the sin2θ has to be maximised to minimise the whole expression
- the inequality part ii : needed to take distinct cases for x less than and greater than one, after using first derivative to analyse behaviour of the second bracket (1+x+x^2...)
- part iii needed one to use the substitution x = a/b, so these two later parts seem very hard to even think of how to approach the question
- question 16 triangle: very confusing to approach but similarity, parallelograms and a touch of algebra, then second part should have easily followed
BUT harder 3u = harder harder 2u??
- question 16 polynomials: slight trick to i., part ii was just algebra, an otherwise approach involved expanding everything and simplifying and part iii. needed to be very careful about what sort of argument to express, ie have to prove real and distinct
a whole bunch of tough questions staggered towards the end sooooo pretty hard test guessing low 70s E4 cutoff? and there’s my rant. hoping for that 90+ raw
Didn't do aswell as everyone else here feeling 60-70 raw with slight chance of 70+ but not too sure, anyone want to guess how 65 raw would align?
It felt easier than previous years.. in the earlier parts. It would seem that most questions were either standard or very difficult, with little middle ground.
Several questions posed a considerable conceptual challenge though! Reverse engineering the result typically did the trick.
I'm fairly sure the ratio in the triangle question was (3sqrt(2)/2)-2 btw
Hoping for 95 raw
Last edited by mathemagician_; 25 Oct 2018 at 7:59 PM.
did anyone get (1/3)^n for first part of prob. feels good.
Q1-14 were normal but Q16 and end of Q15 were hard
hoping for 88-93 raw
How does one find out one's raw mark? Does it come with the scaled mark/contribution thing in mid December ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks