conics questions (1 Viewer)

P

pLuvia

Guest
Find the equation of the tangents to the ellipse 4x2+5y2=20 which are perpendicular to the line 2x+2y-1=0

Find the coordinates of the chords of contact of tangents from the point (1,-1) to the ellipse 5x2+2y2=3
 

joesmith1975

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
261
Location
In front on my computer not doing I should be doin
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Start you off 4x squared + 5y squared = 20

/ by 20

x squared /5 + y squared / 4 =1

a squared =5 b squared = 4

a = root 5 b = root 4 = 2

Thats the ellispe.

The line 2x+2y-1=0
2y=-2x +1
y=-x +1/2

m of 1 = -1


therefore to fnd perpendicular to the line m of 1 times m of 2 = -1

m of 2 =1

using equation y=mx +and - root {a squared m squared + b squared}
y=x + and - root {5 times 1 + 4}
y= x + and - 3


i'll leave someone else to the next bit.
 
Last edited:

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
joesmith1975 said:
using equation y=mx +and - root {a squared m squared + b squared}
y=x + and - root {5 times 1 + 4}
y= x + and - 3


i'll leave someone else to the next bit.
mmmmmm i dunno if what uve done is right...where did u get the " using equation y=mx +and - root {a squared m squared + b squared}" from? the a^2m^2 + b^2 DOES tickle my memory, what i want to know how u developed this 'general' equation, and for the benefit for all the BOS forum members here.
 

joesmith1975

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
261
Location
In front on my computer not doing I should be doin
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
you know how a line eg. y=3x+2 where m=3 and y-intecept = 2

its that type of formula {equation of tangent in terms of its graident}

The formula and how its devired it pretty long but ill do it, i dont think some teachers dont do it but my teacher is fully into maths and is a good teacher.


from equation of tangent using parametres {a cos θ , b sin θ}

x cos θ/a + y sin θ/b = 1

y sin θ = 1 - x cos θ/a

y= b/sin θ{1-x cos θ/a}

y= -bx cos θ/ sin θ + b / sin θ

y= -bx/a cot θ + b cosec θ

Therefore let m = -b/a cot θ

Now -am/b = cot θ

a squared m squared / b squared = cot squared θ

a squared m squared/ b squared = cosec squared θ -1 { from trig.}

cosec squared θ = 1 + a squared m squared / b squared

cosec squared θ = b squared + a squared m squared/ b squared

cosec θ = + and - root {b squared + a squared m squared / b squared}

As y=mx + b

y = mx +b + and - root {b squared + a squared m squared / b}

b's go away

therefore left with

y=mx + and - root {a squared m squared + b squared}



I know its long i hope you understand if not message back on post get back to you as soon as possible.
 

_ShiFTy_

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
185
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
For Q1, since the tangents are perpendicular to 2x + 2y =1 (y = -x + 1/2)
Then the tangents have a gradient of 1
So the family of lines that have a gradient of 1 is y = x + c

Sub y = x + c into 4x<sup>2</sup>+5y<sup>2</sup>=20
Muck around with it, and the discriminant delta must be equal to zero for it to be a tangent. You should get 2 values of c. Plug it back into the line and you will get ur equations..
 

Rax

Custom Me up Scotty
Joined
Jul 30, 2005
Messages
229
Location
In the Bush
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
For the 2nd part use the eqtn for chord of contact......I presume you now it
 

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
comparing joesmith1975's and _ShiFTy_'s methods, i think that in this case, in the context of the question, _ShiFTy_'s is that little bit better. it is easier to follow, the logic seems more clearer AS you do the question. i base this opinion based upon the context of the question. joesmith1975's method works as well, but it would be far superior IF there was a previous part (of the same question) that said to show that the general equation of a tangent is:
y=mx + and - root {a squared m squared + b squared}.

but, this is only a personal response. it is really up 2 you to decide method you want to use.
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
For the first one: what about implicitly differentiating the ellipse, letting dy/dx=1 to obtain -4x=5y, and substituting y=+sqrt[(20-4x2)/5] and solve for x to get x=+10/6, substitute x into ellipse to find the y co-ordinates, and use point gradient formula to find the equation of the tangents?
 

pavittness

pavitt
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
2
Location
bankstown
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
a^2= 3/5 b^2= 3/2

using the result x.x0 /a^2 + y.y0/b^2 =1
sub in the point (1,-1) gives u

5x-2y=3
 

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Riviet said:
For the first one: what about implicitly differentiating the ellipse, letting dy/dx=1 to obtain -4x=5y, and substituting y=+sqrt[(20-4x2)/5] and solve for x to get x=+10/6, substitute x into ellipse to find the y co-ordinates, and use point gradient formula to find the equation of the tangents?
mmmm that would work as well. however, just by mere observations, i think _ShiFTy_'s is quicker, in a sense.

also, riviet, when u said "...substitute x into ellipse to find the y co-ordinates, and use point gradient formula..." its much better to sub x=+10/6 into -4x=5y to get ur y-coordinate. then, as u said, use the point-gradient formula, knowing that m = 1 already :)
 

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
pavittness said:
a^2= 3/5 b^2= 3/2

using the result x.x0 /a^2 + y.y0/b^2 =1
sub in the point (1,-1) gives u

5x-2y=3
Pavittness, welcome to the BOS forums!

for the benefit of all the BOS forum members here, please show us the proof of getting
x.x0 /a^2 + y.y0/b^2 =1 as the equation of the chord of contact. im sure it will be helpful for many of us here. :)
 

_ShiFTy_

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
185
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Mountain.Dew said:
Pavittness, welcome to the BOS forums!

for the benefit of all the BOS forum members here, please show us the proof of getting
x.x0 /a^2 + y.y0/b^2 =1 as the equation of the chord of contact. im sure it will be helpful for many of us here. :)
Proving the chord of contact isnt that hard...
Say u have 2 tangents at P (x1, y1) and Q (x2, y2)
Tangent P = xx1/a^2 + yy1/b^2 = 1
Tangent Q = xx2/a^2 + yy2/b^2 = 1

From inspection, you can see that xx0/a^2 + yy0/b^2 = 1 satisfies both P and Q
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Mountain.Dew said:
mmmm that would work as well. however, just by mere observations, i think _ShiFTy_'s is quicker, in a sense.

also, riviet, when u said "...substitute x into ellipse to find the y co-ordinates, and use point gradient formula..." its much better to sub x=+10/6 into -4x=5y to get ur y-coordinate. then, as u said, use the point-gradient formula, knowing that m = 1 already :)
Ah cool, my method is more 2u'ish, but isn't as messy I guess. Thanks for the tip. ;)
 

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Riviet said:
Ah cool, my method is more 2u'ish, but isn't as messy I guess. Thanks for the tip. ;)
no probs. although i have to say, implicit diff isnt really 2u'ish at all...;)

_ShiFTy_ said:
Proving the chord of contact isnt that hard...
Say u have 2 tangents at P (x1, y1) and Q (x2, y2)
Tangent P = xx1/a^2 + yy1/b^2 = 1
Tangent Q = xx2/a^2 + yy2/b^2 = 1

From inspection, you can see that xx0/a^2 + yy0/b^2 = 1 satisfies both P and Q
ummmmm i dont think that's a sufficient enough proof...we are talking about proving something, not SHOWING something, where 'from inspection' would be a valid way.

but, i am not too sure myself. i prolly need to ask my maths teacher or do a little bit of research. i suppose its just that i have been taught the...'long' way...

Celebrating my 500th post! :D
 
Last edited:

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Mountain.Dew said:
no probs. although i have to say, implicit diff isnt really 2u'ish at all...;)
I was referring to the point gradient formula. :p
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top