Complex numbers help. (1 Viewer)

conics2008

Active Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
1,228
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
In an Argand diagram, the point A represents the complex number z, the point C

represents the complex number​
w and the point B represents the complex number z + w

with​
O being the origin. Describe the geometric properties of the quadrilateral OABC,

providing full reasoning for your answer, given that
z w = 2i(z + w).

Hi I just came across this question and went blank, I drew the thing but the last thing i got confused about it.

Can someone tell me how to approach questions like this. Thank you.
 

Iruka

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
544
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Well, it is a parallelogram, of course.

One of the diagonals is z+w, the other is z-w translated a bit.

So, the fact that z-w = 2i(z+w) means that the two diagonals cross each other at right angles and one is twice the length of the other, as multiplication by a complex number corresponds to a rotation + a scaling. That tells you that the parallelogram is actually a rhombus. (And you should be able to figure out the size of the angles at the vertices by considering the lengths of the diagonals.)
 

waxwing

New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
16
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
conics2008 said:


Can someone tell me how to approach questions like this. Thank you.
On the approach:
Use the known relationships for modulus and argument of product and quotient:


arg(z_1/z_2) = arg(z_1) - arg(z_2) (+2*k*pi, if you must...)
|z_1/z_2| = |z_1|/|z_2|

Thus in the case the difference in the arguments of z-w and z+w is equal to the argument of 2i, which is pi/2.
You get the picture :)

Another thing to bear in mind is to treat complex numbers as in some ways like vectors.
Therefore when you look at something like arg(z-w), you're looking at the angle from the horizontal projected rightwards from w, with the line from w to z. It's as if you're shifting the origin to w, and then calculating z's argument from there.
Btw, to go a little further on Iruka's points, I think you should get something like @ = cos^-1(1/3)

Hope it helps :)
 

ronnknee

Live to eat
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
474
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Iruka said:
Well, it is a parallelogram, of course.

One of the diagonals is z+w, the other is z-w translated a bit.

So, the fact that z-w = 2i(z+w) means that the two diagonals cross each other at right angles and one is twice the length of the other, as multiplication by a complex number corresponds to a rotation + a scaling. That tells you that the parallelogram is actually a rhombus. (And you should be able to figure out the size of the angles at the vertices by considering the lengths of the diagonals.)
A kite, not a rhombus
 

Iruka

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
544
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I think you'd better go and revise your special quads.

Or actually read all that I have written in that post.

A rhombus is both a parallelogram and a kite.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top