Complex number help! (1 Viewer)

Glyde

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
120
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Express z1+z2 in mod-art form if z1=1+(Squareroot3)i and z2=(Squareroot3)+i This is probably really basic but I just started complex numbers this week
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
z1 + z2 = 1+sqrt3*i + sqrt3+i

= (1+sqrt3) + (1+sqrt3)i

You then find the modulus to be sqrt2 * (1+sqrt3) and argument to be pi/4


So it's (1+sqrt3)sqrt2cis(pi/4)
 
Last edited:

Ambility

Active Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
336
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Hey! I just started complex numbers this week as well! I might be wrong, but I'll give it a try.



 
Last edited:

Glyde

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
120
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Now I have to divide (z1+z2) by (z1-z2) I think it would be easier to complete this question using the more simplified mod-arg
 

kawaiipotato

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
464
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Now I have to divide (z1+z2) by (z1-z2) I think it would be easier to complete this question using the more simplified mod-arg
You should find the simplified expression for both z1+z1 and z1-z2, then multiply both numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator.
 

Glyde

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
120
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
You should find the simplified expression for both z1+z1 and z1-z2, then multiply both numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator.
No wouldnt I just divide the modulis and take away the arguement in the denominator from the argument in the numerator
We learnt that shortcut today
 
Last edited:

kawaiipotato

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
464
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
No wouldnt I just divide the modulis and take away the arguement in the denominator from the argument in the numerator
We learnt that shortcut today
Yes, you could do it that way if you were using polar form ( rcis(theta)). Preferably, I would just do what mentioned, because z1-z2 and z1+z2 have 'weird' real and imaginary parts, that probably wouldn't give a 'neat' value for their respective arguments when taking the inverse tan. (I haven't tried yet so their arguments might be simple)

edit: ah nvm I just looked at the above posts and the argument for z1+z2 is just pi/4 so z1-z2 would also be similar. Yeah, your way would be quicker
 
Last edited:

Glyde

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
120
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Yes, you could do it that way if you were using polar form ( rcis(theta)). Preferably, I would just do what mentioned, because z1-z2 and z1+z2 have 'weird' real and imaginary parts, that probably wouldn't give a 'neat' value for their respective arguments when taking the inverse tan. (I haven't tried yet so their arguments might be simple)

edit: ah nvm I just looked at the above posts and the argument for z1+z2 is just pi/4 so z1-z2 would also be similar. Yeah, your way would be quicker
I just tried to do z1-z2 however the argument was 3pi/4 why is it this when I calculated the tan inverse to be -45!!! Shouldn't the answers argument be -pi/4!!!!????
 

kawaiipotato

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
464
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
I just tried to do z1-z2 however the argument was 3pi/4 why is it this when I calculated the tan inverse to be -45!!! Shouldn't the answers argument be -pi/4!!!!????
The argument is 3pi/4.
Draw up the complex number z1-z2 on an argand diagram and label it z1-z2. You'll notice that it lies in the second quadrant. So the argument of it should be pi/2 (since coordinate axes are equal) + angle between the vector z1-z2 and the y axis which is arctan((sqrt3 - 1)(sqrt3 - 1)) = arctan(1)= pi/4. (I know the it the numerator should be negative but I'm considering only the lengths (positive value))
= pi/2 + pi/4 = 3pi/4
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top