We should combine the two integration marathons don't you guys think?
If I am a conic section, then my e = ∞
Just so we don't have this discussion in the future, my definition of the natural numbers includes 0.
We should combine the two integration marathons don't you guys think?
Hence, or otherwise, evaluate:
where n is a positive integer.
If I am a conic section, then my e = ∞
Just so we don't have this discussion in the future, my definition of the natural numbers includes 0.
Using a hyperbolic trigonometric substitution, show that:
If I am a conic section, then my e = ∞
Just so we don't have this discussion in the future, my definition of the natural numbers includes 0.
Using the fact that
,
Evaluate
Last edited by wu345; 31 Mar 2017 at 10:50 PM.
stuck on this one, any ideas?
Last edited by stupid_girl; 15 Apr 2017 at 4:57 PM.
If I am a conic section, then my e = ∞
Just so we don't have this discussion in the future, my definition of the natural numbers includes 0.
It is purposefully obfuscated but I think average MX2 student should be able to interpret it. End of the day, <f,g>_{w} and <f,g> are just two real numbers. The answer would be the same if I call them star and moon, and ask for star/moon.
By the way, I think the condition a,b,k being positive cannot be dropped.
Last edited by Paradoxica; 17 Apr 2017 at 4:35 PM.
If I am a conic section, then my e = ∞
Just so we don't have this discussion in the future, my definition of the natural numbers includes 0.
If I am a conic section, then my e = ∞
Just so we don't have this discussion in the future, my definition of the natural numbers includes 0.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks