I don't think you can use complex numbers. You can just split up the 1/(t^2 - 9) via inspection so it becomes:
(1/6) [1/(t-3) - 1/(t+3)] then you go from there using logs
EDIT: You might be right but in HSC pretty sure you can't do that
So, often when integrating I end up using complex numbers, just because it seems obvious to me.
I don't get a wrong answer, just a different one, that marking criteria usually doesn't mention at all, so I'm just wondering if anyone else has this problem or if i should do something about it. I've attached an example just so you can see what I mean (sorry for bad quality)
21618219_751279525060196_1920454162_o.jpg
This is 2013 question 12 a) and it's worth a whopping 4 marks that I don't want to risk, if a marker disregards my answer just because it looks nothing like the 'correct' answer (which is ln(2)/3)
TIA
I don't think you can use complex numbers. You can just split up the 1/(t^2 - 9) via inspection so it becomes:
(1/6) [1/(t-3) - 1/(t+3)] then you go from there using logs
EDIT: You might be right but in HSC pretty sure you can't do that
Last edited by pikachu975; 10 Sep 2017 at 5:56 PM.
2016 HSC (Accelerated)
// 2 Unit Maths // Studies of Religion 1 //
2017 HSC
// Biology // Physics // Maths Extension 1 // Maths Extension 2 // English Advanced //
Your answer is essentially still correct but you'll need to know about the complex arctangent function to simplify it down to the desired form of the answer (ln(2)/3). See for example here: http://scipp.ucsc.edu/~haber/archive...A10/arc_10.pdf . Knowledge of these matters is of course not within the HSC syllabus. To do the question in a "HSC" way, just use
You can derive this using partial fractions.
Last edited by InteGrand; 10 Sep 2017 at 6:08 PM.
Yea I know you can use partial fractions and that makes it easy, but I don't know why you wouldn't be able to use complex numbers, i's a constant and as long as you don't make an arithmetic error you're still gonna get a correct answer.
(2i/3)*tan^-1(-i/3) is equivalent to ln(2)/3 (according to wolfram alpha at least)
I understand that if the integral has a context, such as volume or distance then I obviously can't use complex numbers, but if its just an indefinite integral and my gut instinct is to force an inverse tan integral instead of using partial fractions then it'd be frustrating to lose marks because of it.
Ahh well, I guess I'll just try and avoid using complex numbers when integrating in future (unless of course I don't think i'll get an answer otherwise).
Thanks
Like I said, your answer involving complex numbers is essentially correct, but you need knowledge of the complex arctangent function to simplify it down to the desired form of the answer (ln(2)/3). And in the HSC, you should probably not use the complex method because it isn't in the syllabus and there's no real need to use it.
Yea that was a reply to Pikachu.
Thanks for the link about the arctangent function, and i can understand that my answer isn't in its simplest form to anyone with knowledge about the arctan function, but everything i've done is mathematically correct and i've answered the question, so being confined to the "HSC" answer is annoying, i feel like im being punished for my creativity
Ah OK.
Well in any case, the markers are probably looking for the answer ln(2)/3. You should probably simplify your answer down to this because if you leave it as a complex arctangent, one could argue this isn't fully simplified, especially since we're dealing with a real integral (so we should give our final answer as a real number).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks