Bored of Studies  

Go Back   Bored of Studies > Secondary Education > New South Wales (HSC) > Science > Chemistry

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
luv2luvurmama's Avatar
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Male
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 174
 
Last Activity:
20 Nov 2009, 2:38 PM
 
luv2luvurmama should be ignored
How did you go?

You can hide this advertisement by registering.
How did everyone go?
Did everyone think it was easier than usual?
Personally, i couldnt draw glycerol, lol, and that gay bread one was anoying, i wont get full marks there. and the last glavanic one
luv2luvurmama 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
<3 Prophet 9
AyyyTAR Hater
 
annabackwards's Avatar
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Female
Location: Sydney
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,292
 
Last Activity:
Today, 5:50 PM
 
annabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to all
Re: How did you go?

I think that equilbrium question killed me.
__________________
Courses:
Extension 1 + 2 maths, Chemistry, Physics, Modern History and Advanced English

UAI aim:
99+

Click the user bars to join the groups of the era





Want a friendly tutor with experience and plenty of resources?
Click here, but hurry as there's only one slot left!
annabackwards 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:23 PM   #3 (permalink)
Exalted Member
 
zazzy1234's Avatar
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Female
Location: lebo land
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 928
 
Last Activity:
9 Nov 2009, 3:53 PM
 
Blog Entries: 2
zazzy1234 is off the scalezazzy1234 is off the scalezazzy1234 is off the scale
Re: How did you go?

Quote:
Originally Posted by annabackwards View Post
I think that equilbrium question killed me.
me to
__________________
this is ma overall internal RAW marks:

chemistry- (74.3%-1st)
biology- (75%-5th out of 11)
extention 1 mathematics-(68.1%-2nd)
mathematics-(68.9%-3rd out of 8)
standard english-(51.5%-20 out of 89)

legal studies-( 64%-4th out of 19)


ATAR AIM= > 60
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21XAvfJvAe0 MUST LISTEN


zazzy1234 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
luv2luvurmama's Avatar
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Male
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 174
 
Last Activity:
20 Nov 2009, 2:38 PM
 
luv2luvurmama should be ignored
Re: How did you go?

So what would be the band 6? I want to know what everyone else thought the exam was? Was it easy hard? or just normal.
luv2luvurmama 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
Mental hi-five me.
 
abhi23's Avatar
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Male
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 121
 
Last Activity:
19 Nov 2009, 10:18 PM
 
abhi23 is on a distinguished road
Re: How did you go?

I thought it was a nice exam, as in I'm glad they didn't experiment on us.
I'd say it was on par with previous years exams.
I'm thinking band 6 will just be the usual 82-83 raw. Anybody else?
abhi23 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
<3 Prophet 9
AyyyTAR Hater
 
annabackwards's Avatar
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Female
Location: Sydney
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,292
 
Last Activity:
Today, 5:50 PM
 
annabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to allannabackwards is a name known to all
Re: How did you go?

^
Agreed. Band six would be very low 80s...

I reckon it was a fair paper.... I made so many errors anyway ><"
__________________
Courses:
Extension 1 + 2 maths, Chemistry, Physics, Modern History and Advanced English

UAI aim:
99+

Click the user bars to join the groups of the era





Want a friendly tutor with experience and plenty of resources?
Click here, but hurry as there's only one slot left!
annabackwards 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:27 PM   #7 (permalink)
Assistant Member
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Undisclosed
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 52
 
Last Activity:
4 Nov 2009, 9:56 PM
 
mitchwong650 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: How did you go?

That was a rather simple exam compared to past years,

i loved the shipwrecks option. pumped that booklet front to back.

however yes, that 6 mark equilibrium question was tricky.

i think i said , incorrectly, what the last change was, but oh well.

I'd say at least 80% raw
mitchwong650 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:32 PM   #8 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 41
 
Last Activity:
Today, 12:22 PM
 
fuller45 is on a distinguished road
Re: How did you go?

Test was OK for me. Some tricky questions in core and multiple choice but overall they tested most of the stuff i knew pretty well.

the question with the ammonia in the bread screwed me up. couldn't get the balanced equation, meant i had to guess the molar ratio's for the next parts lol.

Edit: what was the second change in the equilibrium one. 4mins was increased/decrease (forget) temp and the last one was decreased pressure im pretty sure.
made up some random crap for the second change though lol
fuller45 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:32 PM   #9 (permalink)
New Member
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Female
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 10
 
Last Activity:
15 Nov 2009, 9:49 PM
 
alice09 is on a distinguished road
Re: How did you go?

extended response questions were good, except 4 the equilibrium + 7 marker in art wtf?!
i can't believe i ran out of time on the stupid bread question too!!
fingers crossed the band cutoffs are really low this yr...
alice09 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:32 PM   #10 (permalink)
Member
 
luv2luvurmama's Avatar
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Male
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 174
 
Last Activity:
20 Nov 2009, 2:38 PM
 
luv2luvurmama should be ignored
Re: How did you go?

I agree, i think it wasent anything Very hard, or extremely easy. Some concepts were very difficult. band 6 cut off probably wont go below 80 , most likely around 83 raw
luv2luvurmama 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:36 PM   #11 (permalink)
Super Ultimate User!
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Male
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 223
 
Last Activity:
18 Nov 2009, 6:34 PM
 
aero135 is on a distinguished road
Re: How did you go?

GUYS! I have a good feeling 90% of state wrote C for the last MC question but i know taht cant be write. DId anyone get A or andd B and can explain how?
aero135 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:39 PM   #12 (permalink)
Exalted Member
 
pman's Avatar
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Male
Location: Chk Chk Boom
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 901
 
Last Activity:
Today, 4:44 PM
 
Blog Entries: 2
pman is just really nicepman is just really nicepman is just really nicepman is just really nicepman is just really nice
Re: How did you go?

Well apart from saying oil and water were an emulsion, think it went well, industrial seemed hard comnpared tot the other options though
__________________
All books have now been sold!

Please Don't bother to PM me if interested in any or all



Aim: B. Medical Radiation Physics
pman 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:40 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Male
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 41
 
Last Activity:
Today, 12:22 PM
 
fuller45 is on a distinguished road
Re: How did you go?

i got d, i remember it wasnt c i think, because u had to times something by 24.79 to get volume, and ended up with d
fuller45 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:41 PM   #14 (permalink)
Mental hi-five me.
 
abhi23's Avatar
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Male
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 121
 
Last Activity:
19 Nov 2009, 10:18 PM
 
abhi23 is on a distinguished road
Re: How did you go?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fuller45 View Post

Edit: what was the second change in the equilibrium one. 4mins was increased/decrease (forget) temp and the last one was decreased pressure im pretty sure.
made up some random crap for the second change though lol
I think one of the changes involved removing the product/reactant (can't remember which one) from the system because there was a straight line down on the concentration.
abhi23 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 2 Nov 2009, 1:44 PM   #15 (permalink)
Assistant Member
 
HSC: 2009
Gender: Undisclosed
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 52
 
Last Activity:
4 Nov 2009, 9:56 PM
 
mitchwong650 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: How did you go?

Quote:
Originally Posted by abhi23 View Post
I think one of the changes involved removing the product/reactant (can't remember which one) from the system because there was a straight line down on the concentration.
That's right

carbon monoxide was removed from the environment , causing the sharp drop in CO making the equilibrium shift further to the right
mitchwong650 当前离线   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Enable the quick reply box before clicking this button.

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +11. The time now is 6:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright © 2002 - 2009, iStudy Australia Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0