The libertarian compromise (1 Viewer)

Who should libertarians vote for?

  • Liberal

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Labor

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

loquasagacious

NCAP Mooderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
3,636
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
The believer in libertarian values does not really have a great choice when voting in Australia. Neither of the major parties could be said to fully align with libertarian values, some of the minor parties are perhaps closer - however they will not win power and have to do preference deals with the major parties. So the question becomes whom does the libertarian compromise with?

Free-society, controlled market: This broad grouping includes parties which are traditionally in support of social freedoms, civil liberties, etc however who traditionally advocate for state intervention in the market. The ALP is the major party in this category, and the group includes minor parties like the Greens and the Sex Party.

Controlled-society, free market: This is a broad group of social conservatives, often with a protestant religious background. They do however generally speaking believe in free markets (or at least free-er) than the other group. The Libs are the major party in this category, joined by Family First/etc and other less nationalism based minor parties.

Ultimately though because of our two-party preferred system it comes down to Liberal or Labor. Of these two which should the libertarian support and why?
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
The poll is retarded since you've given options of Labour and Liberal instead of 'Free-society, controlled market' or 'Controlled-society, free market'. At the moment both Labour and Liberal have equally dodgy social liberties records.

This makes even less sense in Australia because it isn't a two-party system at all (though I concede you included 'preferred'). The Coalition has a strong Agrarian element to it in the form of the Nationals, and votes independently of the Liberals every now and then, and the Greens almost hold (and at the next election will hold) the balance of power in the Senate.

But I voted Labour since the Greens are strongly pro-civil rights and are part of the 'Free-society, controlled market' category. I'm first and foremost a social libertarian so of course I'm going to support 'Free-society, controlled market'.
 

badquinton304

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
884
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
the poll is retarded since you've given options of labour and liberal instead of 'free-society, controlled market' or 'controlled-society, free market'. At the moment both labour and liberal have equally dodgy social liberties records.

This makes even less sense in australia because it isn't a two-party system at all (though i concede you included 'preferred'). The coalition has a strong agrarian element to it in the form of the nationals, and votes independently of the liberals every now and then, and the greens almost hold (and at the next election will hold) the balance of power in the senate.

But i voted labour since the greens are strongly pro-civil rights and are part of the 'free-society, controlled market' category. I'm first and foremost a social libertarian so of course i'm going to support 'free-society, controlled market'.
+1
 

Absolutezero

real human bean
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
15,082
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I'm free society, though I don't think that Labor represent those values anymore.
 
Last edited:

Absolutezero

real human bean
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
15,082
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I know. There's no way a smaller party will gain the majority. At least, not in this coming election.
 

Will Shakespear

mumbo magic
Joined
Mar 4, 2006
Messages
1,186
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
imo rudd is so bad on social liberties he's starting to make the libs look a better option purely on that axis :O
 

funkshen

dvds didnt exist in 1991
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
2,137
Location
butt
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
imo rudd is so bad on social liberties he's starting to make the libs look a better option purely on that axis :O
Rudd isn't doing a great job on the social libertarian front but he isn't making the Liberals look like a better option. Do you have the memory of a goldfish or something?
 

zaxmacks

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
295
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
We should abolish parliament and do what ever we want. That'll be fun for the first few days. :)
 

scuba_steve2121

On The Road To Serfdom
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
1,343
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I'm an anarcho capitalist so i do hate both parties but....

I would rather have a better economy, so liberals

labour has just pissed me off with its Keynesian take of the financial crisis. I think i would be able to handle any limits on my liberties that would be imposed from a liberal party government, for now.........
 
Last edited:

withoutaface

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
15,098
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Rudd isn't doing a great job on the social libertarian front but he isn't making the Liberals look like a better option. Do you have the memory of a goldfish or something?
Name one policy Howard implemented that was worse for Australian civil liberties than what Rudd's doing now.
 

Graney

Horse liberty
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
4,434
Location
Bereie
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Name one policy Howard implemented that was worse for Australian civil liberties than what Rudd's doing now.
Australian sedition law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rudd hasn't implemented his policies yet, some policies the liberals proposed just before they lost office were pretty bad, contemporary liberals in 2010 still make reference to bronwyn bishops 'the winnable war on drugs', suggesting that its reforms should be introduced if they were in government, which would be a hell of a lot more messed up than anything rudd has done on alcohol.
 

funkshen

dvds didnt exist in 1991
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
2,137
Location
butt
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Name one policy Howard implemented that was worse for Australian civil liberties than what Rudd's doing now.
You misunderstand me - I'm saying neither side makes the other look better or worse.

I was going to give the Australian Anti-Terrorism Act as an example but all I really have to mention is SUSPENDING the Racial Discrimination Act so it could legally proceed with the Northern Territory National Emergency Response...

I'm not saying Labor is any better - just saying you're a fool to think either side will champion social liberty.
 

withoutaface

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
15,098
Gender
Male
HSC
2004

You misunderstand me - I'm saying neither side makes the other look better or worse.

I was going to give the Australian Anti-Terrorism Act as an example but all I really have to mention is SUSPENDING the Racial Discrimination Act so it could legally proceed with the Northern Territory National Emergency Response...

I'm not saying Labor is any better - just saying you're a fool to think either side will champion social liberty.
Racial discrimination acts aren't a libertarian concept, and they're already discriminating based on race by giving extra welfare handouts.
 

withoutaface

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
15,098
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
But interventions in aboriginal communities are rite
It's probably marginally better than leaving little kids to be raped, but worse than offering them a choice of moving or losing their welfare.
 

SylviaB

Just Bee Yourself 🐝
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
6,867
Location
Lidcombe
Gender
Female
HSC
2021
I don't see how Labour even remotely supports a "free society".
And are non-libertarians just voting for who they would vote for or something?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top