Iridescent
New Member
Society and Culture has always been one of my best subjects. In the Half-Yearlies I got 100% and 93% in the trials...but I always have this fear that my teacher is marking me and my other classmates too easy. (Two other girls got 100% too)
Whenever I've written my Extended Responses, I never go into too much detail about events - I always talk about things generally and their effect.
For Continuity and Change, I hardly even mentioned dates, just the event and it's effect.
So my question is, how detailed are we supposed to go in our extended responses?
Are we supposed to mention dates, describe in detail, events and specific people who made changes?
I've always been marked quite high, but to me it feels like I hardly put enough specific detail into my responses.
What do you usually include in your extended response?
Whenever I've written my Extended Responses, I never go into too much detail about events - I always talk about things generally and their effect.
For Continuity and Change, I hardly even mentioned dates, just the event and it's effect.
So my question is, how detailed are we supposed to go in our extended responses?
Are we supposed to mention dates, describe in detail, events and specific people who made changes?
I've always been marked quite high, but to me it feels like I hardly put enough specific detail into my responses.
What do you usually include in your extended response?