| |
16 Oct 2009, 10:30 AM
| #1 (permalink) |
| New Member  HSC: 2005 Gender: Female Location: Sydney
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11
Last Activity:
7 Mar 2010, 6:10 PM  | Views (Evidence law) You can hide this advertisement by registering. Simple question really, why would one argue in court that a piece of evidence should be considered as a 'view' under s53 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)? Is that because views are subject to more stringent monitoring and other Common Law requirements which do not apply to say, in-court demonstrations?(Yes I'm referring to Evans v The Queen) Thanks in advance for any constructive advice! 
__________________ University of Technology, Sydney Strathfield Girls High |
|  |
|
16 Oct 2009, 2:24 PM
| #3 (permalink) |
| get a rope and neck up  HSC: 2005 Gender: Female Location: intarwebz lol
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 514
Last Activity:
16 Feb 2010, 1:28 PM | Re: Views (Evidence law) the whole point of s53 is that parties make an application for a demo, experiment or inspection to be conducted and the judge must follow certain procedural req's b4 allowing it.
__________________  Sci/Law IV at Usyd |
|
| |
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
