View Single Post
Old 17 Aug 2008, 1:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
cannibal.horse
Executive Member
 
cannibal.horse's Avatar
 
HSC: 2008
Gender: Male
Location: Newcastle
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 729
 
Last Activity:
21 Jul 2009, 6:51 PM
 
cannibal.horse will become famous soon enoughcannibal.horse will become famous soon enough
Re: Are select school/private school teachers of a higher quality?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lyounamu
Yeah, that's my school which is currently ranked 101 or 100!

Anyway, back on track: I don't know if all the good teachers are coming to the urban area. But I am sure about one thing: good teacher empower students to help themselves rather than spoon-feed them throughout the HSC year (or even durng the Preliminary year). Therefore, class environment has an impact on this matter as it affects students' learning environment and the knowledge they absorb. No matter, how much teachers spoon-feed them, if the students themselves are not self-sustaining and not working well, all the effort goes to waste. The reason why we perceive (usually) Selective teachers as the top quality is not necessarily due to the fact that they teach effectivey. It's the students' result that deceive us into thinking that the teachers' efforts go hand in hand with their results. But that's not necessarily the case.

Same story for many private high schools. Students usually are of the high quality than normal public schools and that's probably why they perform well, thus deceiving us to believe that teachers there are awesome to the core. So I think it's all up to the students when it comes to determining how good the teachers are. Apart from that way, how would you really come about determining whether that teacher is good or not? (when you didn't even experience that teacher yourself?)
Whilst I agree that to a large extent it is the students who drive their work teachers play a large role as well.

Having a teacher who's taught a subject for decades/marks the hsc is an enormous advantage. They can show students the mechanics of learning (buzz phrases, key points, 'fishing' techniques where you can borrow information from other dot points) which can really put them head and shoulders above a kid with an excel guide and a lot of time on his hands.

It is particually frustrating in history subjects where the higher marks can often depend on access to university texts (Briant, Bury & Meiggs, Peter Grant, Maria Brosius, Dandamaev etc etc) which can cost big bucks, and with a teacher who knows them thoroughly they can often direct you straight through the tedious sections to the pages they're after.

The boy who got a 99.55 at my school was very smart, but also having (by luck) senior markers in every subject would have played its part as well.
__________________
Squat 3x5: 150kg
Bench 3x5: 95kg
Deadlift 1x5: 177.5kg
(Weightlifting stats for Omnie_Jay).
cannibal.horse 当前离线   Reply With Quote