![]() |
| |||||||
| All of our resources and the "SAM" UAI calculator are currently hosted on www.boredofstudies.org. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Assistant Member HSC: 2005 Gender: Male Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 69
Last Activity:
13 Jun 2007, 12:41 PM | Re: JUAIseek or SAM .5 difference here... I hope the Juai is more reliable though for that will bump me an extra point. |
| |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Old Member HSC: 2005 Gender: Male Location: Sydney
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 495
Last Activity:
8 Dec 2008, 10:53 AM | Re: JUAIseek or SAM good question, im gettin 1 mark difference between the two.
__________________ University of Sydney: Bachelor of Commerce Majors: Accounting/Finance |
| |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Junior Member HSC: 2005 Gender: Female
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 31
Last Activity:
19 Jun 2007, 7:00 PM | Re: JUAIseek or SAM ...what's JUAI?
__________________ without the pretty pink ribbon, you would lift this steaming herd. .. Last edited by dorothygale : 16 Dec 2005 at 10:50 AM. |
| |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| BMW>>>>Mercedes (see sig) HSC: 2005 Gender: Male
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 350
Last Activity:
7 Oct 2007, 11:08 PM | Re: JUAIseek or SAM i got a 0.55 difference, with JUAI being lower. I would think that JUAI is less accurate, and it is not always lower. I think that SAM is more accurate based on what i've heard from past HSCers who've entered their marks into the calculator. And to answer your question, JUAI is another UAI calculator (downloadable), which was provided before the new SAM was released.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Bored Admin HSC: 2001 Gender: Male Location: Darlington
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,183
Last Activity:
Today, 9:51 AM | Re: JUAIseek or SAM Neither JUAI nor SAM attempt to predict UAIs. There is no data in either program pertaining to the 2005 HSC. It is up to you to decide whether UAIs from past years are indicative of your 2005 UAI.
__________________ Lazarus Et in arcadia ego... |
| |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Supreme Member HSC: 2005 Gender: Male Location: Maroubra South
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,306
Last Activity:
Today, 10:02 AM | Re: JUAIseek or SAM JUAI: 97.80 SAM: 98.25 GO SAM! ![]()
__________________ Simon. 21/M The University of New South Wales: I'm there. Are you? ![]() ~ 3rd year Advanced Mathematics (Pure) / Arts (Philosophy + Linguistics) @ UNSW ~ ~ Diploma in Innovation Management @ UNSW ~ "In order not to believe in evolution you must either be ignorant, stupid or insane" Professor Richard Dawkins |
| |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| objective subjectives HSC: 2005 Gender: Female Location: Somewhere over the rainbow..
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,150
Last Activity:
21 Sep 2006, 5:00 PM | Re: JUAIseek or SAM JUAI: 99.30 SAM: 99.25 But seeing how well everyone seems to have gone this year, I think it will go down, although I hope not.
__________________ "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts--for support rather than for illumination." - Andre Lang |
| |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| New Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7
Last Activity:
19 Dec 2005, 10:16 PM | thanks heaps Lazarus for all your work and past helpful advice. I used SAM 2004 this morning only to get more confused. After entering my HSC marks, the Results Profile showed my scaled marks out of 50. Now past 'Scaling of Courses' indicated that English Ext 1 & 2, Maths, Maths Ext 1, Modern History and Physics would ALL be scaled UP. SAM 2004 shows this happening only for Maths Ext 1. Why? Also, my disappointment at getting only 80 in English Advanced was further dampened by a scaled mark of 31.8/50 - a scale drop of 8.2 marks, nothing like 2001,2002 & 2003. Why again? Can you offer some help - and soon? |
| |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |