HSC 2015 MX2 Marathon ADVANCED (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

My way was a bit different I think:

Note that from the product of roots like Sy did, we get:



But:





This allows us to use a telescoping sum:







But and and which gives:



Now we just split it into the "n is even/odd" cases to find what is and we are done.

This isn't hard knowing that and so with amd
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level







 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

By sketching graphs of and and comparing relevant areas, we come up with the following:



and

.

Evaluation of the integrals and simplification yields



and

.

Division of by yields

.

Taking limits in and using the squeeze theorem gives (and the quotient approaches 1 from below, as clearly ).
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level



 

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Let

The recurrence then implies



which has unique solution

(The form of the recurrence made it clear to me that it would probably have a quadratic solution, so I just looked for something of the form an+b).

So

The sum in question then telescopes to

 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

This is a question from the 1973 HSC 4U paper:











.
 

VBN2470

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
440
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2017
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

NEW QUESTION:



Don't know if this was the right place to post this q.
 
Last edited:

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

NEW QUESTION:



Don't know if this was the right place to post this q.
I think any proper proof of this will need a precise definition of the reals, which is comfortably outside the scope of mx2. (Unless you allow people to assume the extreme value theorem, which implies the claimed result almost trivially).
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

NEW QUESTION:



Don't know if this was the right place to post this q.
Since is continuous on , it continuous on for any positive real number . If is never positive, then clearly attains a maximum (0) at x = 0. So assume is positive somewhere in the interval , where is some positive real number.

By the Extreme Value Theorem, attains a maximum value on , say at . Since , it means that for all greater than some positive number (which must be greater than ), we will have . Now consider the interval . By the Extreme Value Theorem, attains a maximum on here. If , then attains the maximum value on the interval (since for all and for all ). Otherwise (i.e. ), attains the maximum value on , since for all , for all , and for all . In either case, indeed attains a maximum on (the maximum being ).
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

As a sidenote for any HS students that want to know where the extreme value theorem comes from, here is what you need to know for one proof.

1. The least upper bound property of the reals. (Any set A of real numbers which has an upper bound M has a LEAST upper bound U. Being the least upper bound means that U =< M for any other upper bound M). In fact, the reals are can in a certain sense be defined as the smallest extension of the rational numbers that has this property.

2. The epsilon delta definition of a limit, and the definition of Cauchy sequences.

3. The sequential characterisation of continuity.

Then: Show that any sequence in the interval [a,b] has a convergent subsequence, and use this to prove that attains a maximum for any continuous function f.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

 

simpleetal

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
54
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Lol I remember this question from my exam 3 weeks ago lol. What I did during the exam was apply AM-GM (they made us prove the general form in the previous parts) for each factor on the LHS, i.e. (1+a3)^3>= 3^3 /2^2 a3 then I just multiplied all the factors and then afterwards I simplied showed equality can't be achieved
 

simpleetal

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
54
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Okay, so the expression just becomes xy(x^2-2y)+1=(x-1)(y-1)
Case 1: Suppose both x,y are positive. If x^2>2y the LHS grows faster than the RHS (xy>(x-1)(y-1) for positive x,y) so equality cannot be achieved. However if x^2<2y, then the second factor on lhs is negative. but if x and y are positive then rhs is non negatuve. hence equality can be achieved if xy (x^2-2y) is -1 which can be achieved via the solution (1,1)
Case 2: if x,y both zero, it is a solution (0,0)
Case 3: If one of x,y is greater than zero while the other is zero, then RHs is always negative while the LHS is 1

Hence the solution set is (1,1) and (0,0)
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Okay, so the expression just becomes xy(x^2-2y)+1=(x-1)(y-1)
Case 1: Suppose both x,y are positive. If x^2>2y the LHS grows faster than the RHS (xy>(x-1)(y-1) for positive x,y) so equality cannot be achieved. However if x^2<2y, then the second factor on lhs is negative. but if x and y are positive then rhs is non negatuve. hence equality can be achieved if xy (x^2-2y) is -1 which can be achieved via the solution (1,1)
Case 2: if x,y both zero, it is a solution (0,0)
Case 3: If one of x,y is greater than zero while the other is zero, then RHs is always negative while the LHS is 1

Hence the solution set is (1,1) and (0,0)
You missed one solution (2,2)

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top