Haha unfortunately the syllabus states it exactly as the performance elements. Well you probably aced core 1 since we had so much practice so you still do too!
Well, the performance element was STRICTLY two points on the syllabus and whilst I do believe so many people answered it incorrectly, I think they might try to give some 'extra' marks meaning if they do that they would have to push the marks up for the entire question as a whole. But is it...
Haha yea the at least core 1 short answer practice helped! Just thinking of the exam now, I know I made a few stupid mistakes in multiple choice which really makes me sad and annoyed. Look, they aim to give marks so if you tied in something relevant try attempt you add a mark or two. Multiple...
Oh wow, didn't even look at the RHS of the sports med syllabus to know that. I still think I answered it well but not that well.
Agree with the core 2 8 marker, way too specific. Otherwise, still really surprised the core of core 2 was missing and the lack of cancer, Ottawa Charter etc in core 1.
Probably on par with the 2011 test difficulty imo. Surprised Ottawa Charter and either drugs/technology weren't asked for IP. Core 2 questions were quite weird too but not too difficult.
Much tougher than last years paper and apart from the 8 marker on core 2 and SM 8 marker, which I'm only a tad iffy about, I think it was a decent paper.