Search results

its abit to math biased if u ask me.

I was r was a variable in the Ep formula - its like 1/x in maths. Therefore its non linear.

Well if you can get 50-60 for this trial which is allways harder than the hsc, youre quite likely to get at least the same in the HSC, and from what my teacher told me, thats all you need.

DONT DROP IT!!! If your getting 50-60 for that exam your basically garanteed a band 6. Remember to compare yourself to the rest of the state, of whom most would fail this badly.

That test was insanely hard. I left like 15 marks blank. I should pass - but not by much. CSSA exams really shit me for some reason.

Yea im pretty sure its quantisation as thats the basics of quantum mechanics - being discrete. All the rest have something to do with waves.

I said neutron scattering was basically fission and talked about fission with the manhatton project and the atomic bomb and the death and destruction etc

Haha I started off my answer by saying it was a false marketing scheme.

Somehow I calculated 80% for the power loss in the transformer. Cant you use that as its sorta like what you would look for in power loss - comparing it to the original??

I thought there was only 5 so no zeros? Wasnt the answer 407.5?

The thing they made you use was double angles from ext 1. However, you only had to apply the formula - not prove it like in ext 1 - they said that.

I honestly felt that the paper wasnt that hard. They even told you to use the sin rule in q.10. However there were some tricky q. like the multiple probabilty q.