Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 40 of 40

Thread: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

  1. #26
    New Member joshay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    14
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    Quote Originally Posted by sja
    it was specific to the stage where they were orbiting around the earth. the only two forces you had to bullshit about were earth's gravity and centripetal force - stating that velocity is perpendicular to the gravity as it goes around

    they didn't ask for the re-entry because it's already been asked in previous years and wanted to expand the questions
    Exactly, whoever it was going on about all that crap that DIDN'T have to do with the Q was just going over board. Though its nice to show knowledge, markers don't wanna read pages that don't relate to the question.
    __________________

    JSHAYY

  2. #27
    momentica-one.deviantart.
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    565
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    didnt the question say that the mission involved the craft being in geostationary orbit, and the specifically stated that it was guided back down the Earth? so yes, i think you would have to talk about other forces such as G-forces involved, not just the centripetal force=gravitational attraction relation
    2007 BMedSc Usyd
    2008 BArch UNSW
    m-one|architecturalBLOG.
    m-one|deviantART.

  3. #28
    Is in A State Of Trance shinji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Syd-ney
    Posts
    2,737
    Rep Power
    8

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    Quote Originally Posted by angmor
    didnt the question say that the mission involved the craft being in geostationary orbit, and the specifically stated that it was guided back down the Earth? so yes, i think you would have to talk about other forces such as G-forces involved, not just the centripetal force=gravitational attraction relation
    i'm jsut thinking
    isn't g-forces the forces tht humans feel?

    the question asked and i quote it directly:
    Analyse the forces acting on this SPACECRAFT during these parts of the mission
    hence, no g-forces are felt by the spacecraft? im probably wrong here thoug h. lol
    NSW UAI - 'o6 - 90.45
    Undergraduate Course - 'o7 - Bachelor of Commerce - UNSW
    'o8 - Usyd Kendo Club

  4. #29
    New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    28
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    G-forces are a measure of acceleration. all matter can be accelerated (f=ma)

  5. #30
    momentica-one.deviantart.
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    565
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    what the above guys' said...g-forces dont have to be felt by astronauts '
    2007 BMedSc Usyd
    2008 BArch UNSW
    m-one|architecturalBLOG.
    m-one|deviantART.

  6. #31
    New Member aaaazzzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    25
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    Quote Originally Posted by myeewyee
    G-forces are a measure of acceleration. all matter can be accelerated (f=ma)
    g-force is used to express the apparent weight of an object in a multiple of the true weight......obviously there is no g-force for the spacecraft....since the acceleration equals to the gravitational acceleration.....
    tht is g+a/g=g-g/g=0

  7. #32
    momentica-one.deviantart.
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    565
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    no actually im pretty sure g-forces are also experienced when reentering the Earth's atmosphere...dunno its in the textbook. they have to minimise the g-forces on astronauts as they reenter earth
    2007 BMedSc Usyd
    2008 BArch UNSW
    m-one|architecturalBLOG.
    m-one|deviantART.

  8. #33
    New Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Epping
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    This question was fkn gay... I put down..

    centripetal force due (Earth's gravitational attraction)
    drag force causing spacecraft to lose altitude
    g-forces on astronauts in re-entry
    Last edited by andyman20; 28 Oct 2006 at 2:35 AM.

    - KiWoonG -

  9. #34
    Junior Member Wackedupwacko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    141
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    bs for the win.... i think all the forces are, gravity in orbit (slip in the "zero g" feeling) as well centripetal. thrust from rockets to get it into reentry position, air - friction force as it reenters (on top of gravity) g forces experienced is quite large... and i htink i slipped in parachutes creating drag which retards the spacecraft creating a further retarding force.
    English Advanced, Math Ext2, Physics, Japanese Continuers

  10. #35
    New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    10
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    doesnt it only want forces on the craft, not on occupants?

  11. #36
    New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    HSC
    N/A
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    Quote Originally Posted by RingerINC

    And during reentry the whole g-forces speel on people getting knocked the fuck out, also gravity.
    ahahaha oh I love the way you worded that, I hope you wrote that in the exam! in terms of the physics yes i pretty much agree with you but ahaha you are funny

  12. #37
    Junior Member dunno04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    137
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    This question is Ghey.
    You don't know that they are asking.

    well...
    Firstly, when orbitting, Centripetal force and Gravitational force are in equilibrium...
    so that a velocity is needed to be maintained to keep the orbit

    secondly, while re-entering...the optimum angle (5.2-7.2 degrees), Gravity. and weight force (F=mg).

    That's what i have written.
    =D
    Life goes on.
    My High SChool Journey ends here.

    UAI: 94.45
    Very Happy about it.
    =D

  13. #38
    New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    28
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    Quote Originally Posted by aaaazzzz
    g-force is used to express the apparent weight of an object in a multiple of the true weight......obviously there is no g-force for the spacecraft....since the acceleration equals to the gravitational acceleration.....
    tht is g+a/g=g-g/g=0
    Its irrelevant what its used for. What it IS is a measure of acceleration. Quote from wikipedia (yeah not the best source but i'm lazy):

    The g is used primarily in aerospace fields, where it is a convenient magnitude when discussing the loads on aircraft and spacecraft (and their pilots or passengers). For instance, most civilian aircraft are capable of being stressed to 4.33 g (42.5 m·s−2, 139 ft/s²), which is considered a safe value. The g is also used in automotive engineering, mainly in relation to cornering forces and collision analysis.
    kthx


    Quote Originally Posted by Wackedupwacko
    bs for the win.... i think all the forces are, gravity in orbit (slip in the "zero g" feeling) as well centripetal. thrust from rockets to get it into reentry position, air - friction force as it reenters (on top of gravity) g forces experienced is quite large... and i htink i slipped in parachutes creating drag which retards the spacecraft creating a further retarding force.
    Exactly what I said. I dunno if they'll pay marks for the parachute thing though

  14. #39
    New Member meekzy89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    HSC
    2006
    Gender
    Female
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    this question was easy

    you didnt have 2 say anything about re-entry as it only asked for WHILE in orbit.


    therefore
    define geostationary orbit
    you could say that the only force acting on the space shuttle is a centripetal force keeping it in orbit.

    GRAVITY acts as this centripetal force.

    you would then draw a diagram

    then you would say something about WEIGHT.
    define weight and how even though the astronauts feel weightlessness .. the weight force still exists an cannot be eliminated as they are still within the gravitational field of the planet and therefore experience 'apparent weightlessness'

    yep yep.
    x.Meeky. [[FPT]]

  15. #40
    Executive Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    HSC
    N/A
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    1,191
    Rep Power
    8

    Re: Geostationary Orbits (Q17)

    Quote Originally Posted by meekzy89
    this question was easy

    you didnt have 2 say anything about re-entry as it only asked for WHILE in orbit.
    Yes, not reading the question normally does make them easier

    Question quoted again
    Parts of a space mission involve a spacecraft spending time in geostationary orbit and then returning safely to earth

    Analyse the forces acting on this spacecraft during these parts of the mission

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •