Reply With QuoteI think i'll try redhat first though, since someone told me thats what UNSW uses anyway
hahaha, I have used unix remotely on my webservers for 3 years now -_-
Jeo.
I think i'll try redhat first though, since someone told me thats what UNSW uses anyway
Jeo.
Dude, trust me redhat aint good. Go for mandrake instead, theyre both similar. Redhat has HEAPS of bugs and memory leak problems.
Slackware or Debian aint hard to install either. They GUI during installation isnt graphicall but has text mode graphics which is simple. All u need is to know how to use the TAB button on your keayboard.
haha. im going to stick with XP..............
because so many programs are built for XP, i couldn't be bothered installing linux......
Jeo.
And the proof of this is...?Originally posted by -X-
Dude, trust me redhat aint good. Go for mandrake instead, theyre both similar. Redhat has HEAPS of bugs and memory leak problems.
If anything, Mandrake would have more bugs than Redhat. A linux distribution is just a collection of different people's (free) software based around a linux kernel - it really is the sum of its parts.
Mandrake traditionally includes the latest-and-greatest software (stuff that isn't in anyone's stable tree), whilst Redhat tends to hold back slightly more. This points, if anything, to Mandrake having more bugs from using software that hasn't been tested as much.
That's cool, but what do you do once the install has finished? You have a (textual) terminal, and wa-hey! This is not a good sight for first-time linux users (which it seems Joe isn't, but let's talk in general), who are used to the convenience of having Windows automatically configure nearly everything for them - much like Redhat and Mandrake do.Originally posted by -X-
Slackware or Debian aint hard to install either. They GUI during installation isnt graphicall but has text mode graphics which is simple. All u need is to know how to use the TAB button on your keayboard.
And if you suggest that debconf can be used for setting up XFree86, that's fine but with every computer I've set debian up on, it has either not worked or chosen borked settings that I've had to fix in XF86Config. Redhat and Mandrake were perfect.
They really should merge the graphical auto-detection program used in Knoppix with the debian installer. If they had this then you bet most newbies would be using debian.
If you make any Linux onto every home users desktop without formally fixing up the whole OS i am absolutely sure you've got more than a handful of flaws, since it's Open Source, and every developer has their own methods of implementation i don't think every portion of the OS is actually consistent enough to be bulletproof.
umm...no. Heaps and heaps of users including me, have had problems with redhat 8. Basically memory leaks galore even after a full kernel recompile. Versions of redhat before 8 were great. The bugs im talking about in redhat have nothing to do with the extra programs but some sort of core app. Installing redhat with minimum space (discarding all the extra programs n shit) doesnt help either.Originally posted by yoshi
And the proof of this is...?
If anything, Mandrake would have more bugs than Redhat. A linux distribution is just a collection of different people's (free) software based around a linux kernel - it really is the sum of its parts.
I know you would expect mandrake to be less stable than redhat but atleast there arent many problems reported, atleast not serious ones. Use redhat 8.0 for 1-2 hours and youl see what i mean.
That's cool, but what do you do once the install has finished? You have a (textual) terminal, and wa-hey! This is not a good sight for first-time linux users (which it seems Joe isn't, but let's talk in general), who are used to the convenience of having Windows automatically configure nearly everything for them - much like Redhat and Mandrake do.
And if you suggest that debconf can be used for setting up XFree86, that's fine but with every computer I've set debian up on, it has either not worked or chosen borked settings that I've had to fix in XF86Config. Redhat and Mandrake were perfect.
Im not familiar with debian installation as i mentioned before. But from what i hear its great. If your average "Joe" cant type the letter "x" in the terminal screen after installation then they shouldnt use a computer let alone linux. Slackware helps u configure the basic things in your computer during installation (ie video card etc...). Once installation is finished you will get a terminal screen were u type "x" to get to your desktop/window manager with generic h/ware settings/configurations or if your an advanced user u can just customize things. The whole point of using linux is to learn and have fun.
actually it's "startx"
"You embrace post modernism, to avoid having an original thought. You criticise yourself, because it places you above criticism." - He died with a felafel in his hand (the film)
Ahh probably is i cant remember. I know some distros use "startx" while others use just "x" though.
ah ok
Jeo.
I have it installed on a laptop here, and it's been used for a few months now full-time. No problems at all. In fact I tried Redhat 9 but that had some problems with Java VM so I had to go back.Originally posted by -X-
Use redhat 8.0 for 1-2 hours and youl see what i mean.
Where were the memory leaks? In the kernel or in userland programs? It could very well have been a kernel problem since Redhat (and Mandrake) have a habit of patching up kernels something fierce.
It is great - after you've gone through it a few times or you're not new to linux. I bet no newbies told you the installer was greatOriginally posted by -X-
Im not familiar with debian installation as i mentioned before. But from what i hear its great.
But really this is a moot point. Choosing a distribution is like horses for courses.
Im not sure where the problem lies as even with redhat 9.0 the problem was evident even though programs / kernel was updated. You probably are one of the lucky ones then if it worked for you. However, moving from redhat to slackware has showed a HUGE difference in loading times, running / starting applications and even in UT2003.Originally posted by yoshi
I have it installed on a laptop here, and it's been used for a few months now full-time. No problems at all. In fact I tried Redhat 9 but that had some problems with Java VM so I had to go back.
Where were the memory leaks? In the kernel or in userland programs? It could very well have been a kernel problem since Redhat (and Mandrake) have a habit of patching up kernels something fierce.
Well there isnt much difference between slackware and debian other than debian having great package management and slackware being the oldest linux distro.Originally posted by yoshi
It is great - after you've gone through it a few times or you're not new to linux. I bet no newbies told you the installer was great
But really this is a moot point. Choosing a distribution is like horses for courses.
For newbies: Knoppix to try it out, SuSE when you install on the HD.
For the advanced types: Debian. All the way.
(Oh, and slack.)
haha ubuntu didn't exist in 2003
i woke up with no drugs but within 10 minutes i was high and toked up
I remember using knopix in 2005 for programming, I made a 23 matches game and had to leave the computer with the last one, and made a program to cheat so I could win because it was impossible otherwise
Good times with C++
Advantages: virus free, all open source, plenty of help forms for people new to Ubuntu, pretty much plug and play, fast, and a lot of great software.
Disadvantages: some printers you will have an issue with getting to work with it, programs that are proprietary to windows or mac you might not be able to run them unless you run virtual box. That's about everything I can think of off the top of my head
UBUNTU due to its feature :Comprehensive software updates
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks