Evaluate the role of discretion in the criminal justice system (1 Viewer)

J-moose

New Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
1
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Hello forum!
I was wondering if anybody could assist me with the essay question by means of a scaffold of possible points to evaluate and assess in relation to the question.
Any legislation and cases that are relevant would be awesome too :)
This is my first post on the forum so here we go!

Cheers.
 

andreatheodore

New Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
1
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
this isnt a scaffold but I hope it helps. its the beginning of an essay, you just have to add in legislation and relevant examples ect.

Discretion is judgement, and in specific to the criminal justice system, the judgement exercised by applying principles, values and facts. The discretion of police and judges is of paramount importance but in reality, discretion is used from the planning of the crime by the offender, reporting the crime by victims and witnesses, to police investigation, the DPP role in taking the case to court, charge negotiation and judicial discretion. Discretion in the criminal justice system also continues in post sentencing decisions to the extent of detaining serious offenders in prison past there sentence period. Therefore, the role of discretion is essential throughout the whole of the criminal justice process.
Discretion acknowledges that the law can be a blunt instrument in delivering justice. It allows individual circumstances to be taken into account when applying the law. It is considered important in the criminal justice system as it allows it to balance the rights of the community with the rights of individuals, the accused and the victims and addresses the tension and any possible discrepancy between these competing interests.

Police exercise discretion every day as they have discretionary powers of arrest in certain matters and have discretion in the exercising of their powers when carrying out their duties. They often have to make informed decisions about whether to take crimes further and this decision will depend on factors such as the severity of the crime, the circumstances surrounding the crime and if there is enough cause to take it further. When investigating a crime, police may wish to dismiss their investigation. This is often because of a struggle to find evidence to arrest the suspect or if the crime is very minor. For less serious offences, police may simply issue a warning or caution yet if a caution is issued more than three times, police will usually arrest the offender so that the matter is heard in court.
In all cases, the jury plays a major role in the outcome of the offender, as it is their discretion which determines the final say in the case and deems the accused guilty or not guilty. It is important that the jury looks at both sides of the argument carefully and make an informed decision which considers all the evidence and circumstances as not doing so may result in the miscarriage of justice.
The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) has discretion with respect to what matters they will prosecute. They are given discretion as to whether they dismiss a case against the defendant based on factors such as the probability of achieving a conviction, the amount of evidence, if it is in public interest to prosecute, the nature of the offence and the characteristics of the offender.
 

enoilgam

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Messages
11,886
Location
Mare Crisium
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2010
andreatheodore is on the right track, although I would probably structure it more rigidly by dedicating a paragraph to the discretion of the public, police discretion and judicial discretion.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top