-
Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students! -
YOU can help the next generation of students in the community! Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
Section II - Short Answer (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Rafy
- Start date
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
Lol, environmentally friendly bag question
DISCUSS
i actually wrote that the impact would be the opposite of the goal, that the customers would see through the false claims and cheap advertising lines
Lol, environmentally friendly bag question
DISCUSS
i actually wrote that the impact would be the opposite of the goal, that the customers would see through the false claims and cheap advertising lines
liquid-tension
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
- Messages
- 24
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
i did the opposite lol.
claiming that they would be drawn to the 100% recycled/gov tick(tick of what? gov of what?)
omg well
IF OVER
im going to burn all my business books right now
.
i did the opposite lol.
claiming that they would be drawn to the 100% recycled/gov tick(tick of what? gov of what?)
omg well
IF OVER
im going to burn all my business books right now
.
huhwotsthis
Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2008
- Messages
- 264
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2009
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
i guess i got about 50%
i guess i got about 50%
Michaelmoo
cbff...
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2008
- Messages
- 591
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
For the environmental one. The very last question. Very unconventional. I mentioned its ability to maintain a customer-oriented approach through appealing to environmental beliefs. And all the features etc
But in the end, my final judgement was that it wasn't effective. I dno if I'm wrong but there was no indication that the busienss effectively branded its product. You couldn't tell it was for a particular business so how would it effectively enhance the busiensses reputation?
For the environmental one. The very last question. Very unconventional. I mentioned its ability to maintain a customer-oriented approach through appealing to environmental beliefs. And all the features etc
But in the end, my final judgement was that it wasn't effective. I dno if I'm wrong but there was no indication that the busienss effectively branded its product. You couldn't tell it was for a particular business so how would it effectively enhance the busiensses reputation?
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
You sir, are a genius. I failed to recognise that, I'm still hoping to scrape the marks though...
You sir, are a genius. I failed to recognise that, I'm still hoping to scrape the marks though...
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
Insted of evaluating debt finance for product expansion, i did debt finance for global expansion so i had to then quickly dot point what i should written on the back. And the BAG QUESTION FAIL... just made stuff up...
Insted of evaluating debt finance for product expansion, i did debt finance for global expansion so i had to then quickly dot point what i should written on the back. And the BAG QUESTION FAIL... just made stuff up...
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
for the environment bag question ..
i put down.. price discrimination since they said Pensioner is cheaper.. and misleading and deceptive .. basically i make up shit on the second one .. =,= since i said 100% environmental friendly is misleading since there is insufficient information to proof or something
overall , short answer was alright but not the employment contract part.
for the environment bag question ..
i put down.. price discrimination since they said Pensioner is cheaper.. and misleading and deceptive .. basically i make up shit on the second one .. =,= since i said 100% environmental friendly is misleading since there is insufficient information to proof or something
overall , short answer was alright but not the employment contract part.
BUSINESSKING
Member
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
Very easy, 40/40. I'm incredible.
Very easy, 40/40. I'm incredible.
carlytse621
Member
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
- it states the wages and working condition
- it outlines the right and obligations og employees and employers
I put
- it states the wages and working condition
- it outlines the right and obligations og employees and employers
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
only one i realy had trouble wif i think was employment contract. i put minimum awards and obligation for employee to act ethicaly. that wrogn? shuld get above 35. maybe 37-38 outa 40 is employment contract is right
only one i realy had trouble wif i think was employment contract. i put minimum awards and obligation for employee to act ethicaly. that wrogn? shuld get above 35. maybe 37-38 outa 40 is employment contract is right
rowdyroddy
Member
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
for employment contract i put about the wages they receive and their working hours
for employment contract i put about the wages they receive and their working hours
matthew91
Member
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
For the Emplyment contract i put wages and for sum fucked up reason put duty of care lol
For the Emplyment contract i put wages and for sum fucked up reason put duty of care lol
murphyad
Member
Re: Business Studies Section II: Short Answer
Just as a general remark: did anyone find the short answers as a whole rather unorthodox?
Like when I got in there and started reading them, the thought that hit me first was 'Oh. This is all the stuff that I didn't expect to be in the exam'. The content in SA was gulfs apart from the sorts of questions we'd been asked in the trials and it threw me off balance for a while.
Furthermore, sometimes I got the feeling that you could hit different syllabus dot pts for some questions. For the very last SA question on the enviro-bags or whatever, Michaelmoo wrote about customer-oriented marketing but I talked about psychological influences on consumer choice - regardless of which one was (more) correct, it seemed that in some cases it was difficult to make a link between the question and the syllabus.
On a final note, after the exam I went home and looked through my classroom notes and my textbook regarding the features of an employment contract. Couldn't find any reference to them =/ which explains my making it up in the room.
But meh. Two-fingered salute to Board of Studies and move on I guess.
Just as a general remark: did anyone find the short answers as a whole rather unorthodox?
Like when I got in there and started reading them, the thought that hit me first was 'Oh. This is all the stuff that I didn't expect to be in the exam'. The content in SA was gulfs apart from the sorts of questions we'd been asked in the trials and it threw me off balance for a while.
Furthermore, sometimes I got the feeling that you could hit different syllabus dot pts for some questions. For the very last SA question on the enviro-bags or whatever, Michaelmoo wrote about customer-oriented marketing but I talked about psychological influences on consumer choice - regardless of which one was (more) correct, it seemed that in some cases it was difficult to make a link between the question and the syllabus.
On a final note, after the exam I went home and looked through my classroom notes and my textbook regarding the features of an employment contract. Couldn't find any reference to them =/ which explains my making it up in the room.
But meh. Two-fingered salute to Board of Studies and move on I guess.