Thankyou! Finally someone who can read too! i got out of exam and half people were talking about 2 case studies and i was like oh fuck im screwed so now im here checking. Few!!! should be ok then.
Worst Exam ever essay questions wise, even some of the short answers were weird - dont they...
im thinking 'local' for economic activity:
2002 Local + Global (Global chanegs impact on local economic activity)
So its been Global 4 times in last 5 years. Sureley they wouldnt make it 5/6!
the test was to measure - 'GOAL SHOOTING'
therefore, passing the ball back and forth isnt an accurate test of how good you can shoot?!!! it has nothing to do with goal shooting = invalid!
plus the fact that it was repeated twice does not mean it is reliable - cos what if...
thankyou - all these people are saying tourism this and tourism that - it cant be on tourism specifically! but u know....
if its biophysical interactions for ecos at risk i will kiss the paper for 20% of reading time. should gun ecos anyway.
anyone know what an 85 raw would align to? or a 90...
yeh i strugdled with that a bit to. think ill only be looking at 7-8 outa 12 for that which is very disappointing.
Does anybody know what the scaling/alignment of raw marks is like for PDH?
70% raw = aligned?
80% raw = aligned?
your actual internal assesment mark doesnt make a difference mate - whether its 100% or 20%, its all do with rank. So tell me rank and how many students do maths and yeh youll probably get a better idea...
i reckon i got about 76/120 (63%) raw im ranked 4th out of 17 though and im...