Search results

necrophag is boring. nile too sorta, but listenable

lol

lol :confused: a lot of these weren't mentioned in the post I quoted

you are correct

lol i was thinking of doing this just the other day but it slipped my mind. gives some cool results

in the post I quoted? (I'll admit I may have missed a couple)

out of those listed, i would say only these are worth listening to (and only the earlier material from each band)

what's that thing you did with the inverse tans? :S should be: \frac{1}{4\sqrt 2}(\pi -ln(3+2\sqrt 2))

just looking at the question, that seems like a very strange substitution to make. is that definitely the substitution it asks for?

i'm impressed that poland has the balls to do this

i'm pretty sure your solution is correct

were there even any posts that made that assumption? :confused:

indeed it does.. my solution was this (however it's not really the projectile motion approach) " say the projectory of the stone is represented by y=-Cx2, so that the origin is the maximum point/height if d is the distance the stone travels to get from a height of 2p (max) to p, then p = Cd2...

if you started with the odd numbers, you could just do 6*7*8*9 to put the evens in

it's just 9!/5! 9! to arrange the numbers, then divide by 5! -> having the odd numbers in a given order is basically the same as them all being the same number (i.e. same number of arrangements as total arrangements for 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 6 8) michaelmoo's reasoning is correct too (pick the spot...

"wrong" is ambiguous

and one or step up

one time i think maybe two time

u c?

(exactly)