Search results

things have definitions. not everything is subjective. or can i say that an apple is a small furry creature thats mainly nocturnal and eats grubs? cuz, its subjective and all

you still. it doesn't matter that there were additional bombings after, just that the bombings were going on before Iraq

where'd i say 1+1=2 is wrong? i just said its not an absolute truth...it requires on a basis of given rules we place upon math, along the lines of what withoutaface said anyway, your second part is removed as soon as you deal with units...everyone would agree that one apple is, well, one apple

where the heck did you get the idea that they were arrested and jailed for not voting? thats in no way accurate. what about that was different between australia and america?

well, you can't, though. 1 + 1 = 10 if we're in binary. So the simple statement of 1 + 1 is 2. There have been studies that show it is more or less ingrained in us to identify between the ideas of 1, 2, and many, and shortly after, to be able to add or subtract up to 3. But generally speaking...

that was just, genius. the whole thing should be an ad campaign

They WEREN'T forced, though. No one forced them to vote again, many of those involved in the violence in Iraq are Sunnis and Baathists, those that had the most power under Saddam and now, no longer in the majority, are not terribly happy.

cuz thats probably a sin too

ok, you're biased. taht he's an idiot and what he said offends a great many doesn't mean silencing outright is ok. it was and is a bad law, imo. though no idea why he thought it was a good idea to reenter the country. think he's regretting that move.

my question, why bother with camels? no one is gonna follow that

If Iraq didn't want to be a democracy, then why has turn out been as much as it has? why did Iraqis walk miles to vote, with the threat of suicide bombings present anyway? there are millions of Iraqis that are risking their lives to be part of a democratic country, especially after Saddam did a...

terrorism isn't a belief, its a methodology

i do personally know two couples that are now married where there were large distances involved...both at least 4 or 5 thousand km. actually..one about that much, and one about double that. they're very difficult...and require both people to willing to go through a whole lot of tough...

Re: should gays be allowed to marry in NSW but if a friend of yours did say something, it'd be fine for him to get beaten up, right?

Re: should gays be allowed to marry in NSW would be alright if you or one of your friends got beaten up because of something you said about a girl as well?

america's invasion doesn't enter into it....there's been suicde bombings before that. heck, the whole thing that got the u.s. rolling as far as being more concerned with the rest of the world was a suicide attack on 9/11. suicide bombings have been going on for a while....and its just rather...

thats utter insanity. the cause of increased suicide bombings is fanatical fundamentalists BLOWING THEMSELVES UP. They're not being forced into that in any way. The people responsible for suice bombings are the people that did the suicide bombings.

Re: should gays be allowed to marry in NSW i'd agree fully about plenty of straight people.

trying to say its not supposed to be literal interpretations on this is rather a stretch. underlying concepts are what one reads into it....literal interpretations come from taking it as face value, and as such, i would consider to be more accurate when it comes to, say, guidelines on how one is...

rape is given as a reason in a very small percentage of the cases....and if that does become neccessary, i'm going to bet she'll just go into one of the neighboring states