MedVision ad

Search results

  1. C

    2021 BoS Chemistry Trial

    I have received a question about q22(a) by DM, so am posting about it here in case others want to know. An indicator for an acid-base titration will itself be a weak acid or base, so take it as having HInd as its acidic form. It is therefore present in solution as an equilibrium: HInd (aq) +...
  2. C

    Maths Ext 2 Predictions/Thoughts

    With this graph of \Re{(z)} \geqslant \text{Arg}(z), I wonder how many sketches noted that there should be an open circle at the origin and a closed circle at z=-\pi.
  3. C

    Math Advanced Prediction/Thoughts

    Yes and No. The velocity at impact with the ground is indeed -10\sqrt{69}\ \text{m s}^{-1} or 10\sqrt{69}\ \text{m s}^{-1} in a downwards direction. The particle is not slowing down, however, it is speeding up as it is accelerating in the negative direction and moving in the negative...
  4. C

    2 mark proof question

    I feel old :(
  5. C

    Math Advanced Prediction/Thoughts

    Oops, I'm wrong... I read their working for the time as t = \cfrac{-70 \pm \sqrt{70^2 - 4(-5) \times 400}}{2(-5)} = \cfrac{-70 \pm 10\sqrt{129}}{-10} = 7 \mp \sqrt{129} but I have misread and it is actually t = \cfrac{-70 \pm \sqrt{70^2 - 4(-5) \times 100}}{2(-5)} = \cfrac{-70 \pm...
  6. C

    Math Advanced Prediction/Thoughts

    Is it just mean, or is the arithmetic in 26(b) wrong? isn't it -10\sqrt{129}?
  7. C

    Math Advanced Prediction/Thoughts

    Q25 is the exact sort of mistake that everyone should be checking for after each answer by asking yourself "is my answer reasonable?" As several people have noted, turning $8,000 into over $60,000 in 8 years at less than 1% interest pa = unreasonable. Just like the normal distribution / number...
  8. C

    Maths Ext 2 Predictions/Thoughts

    I posted a version of that in the discussion in the MX2 forum... I wonder how markers will evaluate anything like it?
  9. C

    2021 BoS Chemistry Trial

    One will be released once the marking is complete and marks are announced. In the meantime, if you have specific questions, feel free to ask.
  10. C

    Math Advanced Prediction/Thoughts

    \begin{align*} P(\text{IQ}\ >\ \text{130}\ |\ \text{solve time} <\ \text{2 h}) &= \cfrac{P(\text{IQ}\ >\ \text{130 AND solve time}\ <\ \text{2 h})}{P(\text{solve time}\ <\ \text{2 h})} \\ &= \cfrac{0.025 \times 0.8}{\log_{10}{2}} \approx 0.066 \end{align*} ...using the z-score of +2 (above the...
  11. C

    Maths Ext 2 Predictions/Thoughts

    It's D. It can't be A or B as the particle will not continue along the path AB. It isn't C as the acceleration will result in a decreasing speed, whereas D has an increasing speed, as required.
  12. C

    Math Advanced Prediction/Thoughts

    As did I, but I'd like to check it again
  13. C

    Math Advanced Prediction/Thoughts

    The answer given for q33(d) is incorrect, it is a conditional probability problem as the question asks for P(IQ > 130 given can solve the problem in under 2 h)
  14. C

    2 mark proof question

    Actually, proving the more general result that, for positive integers a and b, and for all integers n > 1 a^n + b^n \neq (a + b)^n might have been easier.
  15. C

    Math Advanced Prediction/Thoughts

    The answer posted for Q23 is wrong, too. The derivative of P = 5000b^{-\frac{t}{10}} is \cfrac{dP}{dt} = -500b^{-\frac{t}{10}} (as the solutions state) only if b = e. The derivative is actually \cfrac{dP}{dt} = -500b^{-\frac{t}{10}}\ln{b}.
  16. C

    Math Advanced Prediction/Thoughts

    Yes, that's my impression, though it strikes me more as challenging than unreasonable.
  17. C

    Math Advanced Prediction/Thoughts

    The answer to q10 in this is wrong. It is B. When x=a, the line is at (a,\ am) and the y-coordinate must be between 0 and 1, so we have that am < 1\ \implies\ m < \cfrac{1}{a}.
  18. C

    Math Advanced Prediction/Thoughts

    You are correct
  19. C

    2 mark proof question

    I wonder what they would make of a proof that invoked Fermat's Last Theorem and noted that this was proven by Andrew Wiles a few years ago, pointing at that if there are no solutions in positive integers a, b, and c for the statement a^n + b^n = c^n for any integer n > 2, and then pointing out...
  20. C

    2 mark proof question

    Can't you just prove this by contradiction? \begin{align*} \text{Suppose that the theorem is false, and so that}\ 2^n + 3^n &= 5^n \\ 5^n - 2^n - 3^n &= 0 \\ \text{However, LHS}\ &= (2 + 3)^n - 2^n - 3^n \\ &= \binom{n}{0} 2^n + \binom{n}{1}2^{n-1} \times 3 + \binom{n}{2}2^{n-1} \times 3^2 +...
Top