OMG THE BASE YEAR IS 130!!!!!! 6000 divided by 130which is base year) x 100 = $4615
Now for the 2nd one, it = 6800 x 130/150=5893 . usually when the human development index rise 0.15 there is not a decline in gdp, standards of living wuld be higher, people wuld be earning higher incomes etc...
well i thought the same thing about physics also, until i came across a thread talking about these 3 subjects and their difficulty. i am trying to find it now. someone said economics was the best 2 unit subject to do well in if i remember correct.
well i was unsure as to whether to use the multiplier, so i instead found the trend, that each year that consumption raises 50, income raises 100, so i assumed wen it raised to 300, that income would be 800. not sure if this is right though.
economics is classed just as hard as physics and chemistry. to get 90 in physics one year,78 was the cut off. i am so sorry but you don't know what your talking about.
bell no way it would be 88, the cut off for pe for is around there, economics scales just as well as physics if not better, a raw mark of around 82 shuld get you band 6.
someone proove me otherwise? because you obviously all are stooges, who do not know how to calculate real gdp for year 3. and instead did 100/150, which is incredibly wrong.
mataa.. okkk the formulaa to calculate real gdp is Nominal GDP x 100/CPI. okay now listen carefully. 100 is the base year, generally you are given year 1 and year 2. okay. year 1 is 100. hence year 2 was the first year in this case, so to calculate real gdp. it is 130/150 x nominal gdp, which...
12. is A. you alll got tricked. to calculate the nominal gdp, yu have to Nominal GDPx Year 2/CPI. 100/CPI only refers to the second year, as 100 is usualy base year, but for year 3 base year is year 2. mauahhahah