Search results

Umm NaOH doesn't really replace any natural product... that was sorta why my answer didnt fit the question lol. I'm just hoping i can get maybe 3-4 marks for talking about the development of diaphragm-mercury-membrane cells coz that bit sort of fit the question

I thought in general the test was quite easy. Except i misread the 7 marker in industrial chem. Instead of talking about a natural product that has been artificially produced, I talked about NaOH which isnt artificially produced... I'm hoping i can get up to a maximum of 5 for what i wrote...

It was interesting they made us talk about 2 contemporary issues, i.e in HR and Crime. But that was the only thing i didnt know last week so i studie it hard as and im glad it came up. Ended up talking about victims of crime, their rights and access to justice

19a and 20a Pretty much "Tell us everything u know about the topic and how it came to be and when."

It's just a clarification for next year, we still have to do it for the 2006 paper but obviously they think the syllabus needed some slight editing before next year.

AWA's are de-centralised wage determination agreements and are not enterprise agreements Enterprise agreements are between groups of employees sometimes represented by a union and the employer on an enterprise level. This therefore makes enterprise agreements a collective agreement.

I think the exam seemed to be good. The personality question suited Leni Riefenstahl to a tee, the German question was probably the toughest part of the paper but certainly not hard and the cold war was nice and broad too. For the nationalism in Germany i talk about how the socialist...

I outright argued against the physical journey question, didn't fit with my texts at all so i went out and argued that phys journ are all about learning from history and the experiences of others. I hate arguing against the statement but I felt I had to and I think/hope I pulled it off