Search results

my third text is metropolis but i've already done frankenstein and buddha in the attic. i think later my school will do waiting for godot as well. oh true i forgot about the hschub, thanks!

hi! thank you very much for those tips, I've studied 2 of my WOU texts but i'm a bit fuzzy on the last one. it's probably important to know all 3 though right? also what do you think about the probability of nesa asking for 3 related texts? also do you have any tips for literary worlds? i find...

i was wondering what do you mean by students are rewarded for extra detail in subjects like physics? I thought physics marking guidelines were strict for what they want you to say in short answer as with chemistry. so going into too much detail would produce a convoluted response.

wouldn't you have to derive OOS formulas such as the cross product, scalar triple product, etc.?

hi! does anyone have mod 6 chem/phys papers (preferably hard ones) that I can use to practice? Thank you! Also if anyone wants to trade resources, then dm

hi, does anyone have tips for doing well in the extension 1 english course. also are there metropolis/frankenstein notes/essays that anybody share? thank you!

Hi, if anyone has hard mod 5 chem/phys questions and papers (preferably task 1's) please send them to me. ill be happy to trade my own resources as well. thank you

damn looks pretty good, only question is doesn't gpt-4 api cost money for each use?

omg tysm

hi, does anyone have past papers for mod 5 physics? preferably hard ones. thank you!

thank you so much, yep i realised that i could just do a contradiction proof most of the time instead of actually doing it backwards and then having to rewrite it.

yeah true, i was introduced to this method in a number proof question: Prove that the second digit after the decimal point of √2 is 1 without a calculator. and the working out started with this: 1.41 < √2 < 1.42 then it squared everything. then it evaluated 1.41^2 and 1.42^2 and showed that the...

hi, just checking that this is a valid method for proof. also how would you structure it? would you just say "therefore by backwards reasoning ___ is true" or draw arrows going back in your working out? thank you

unfortunately this isn't true, it must be a rhombus not just a parallelogram. proof: quadrilateral - In a parallelogram, does the diagonal bisect the angles that they meet? - Mathematics Stack Exchange

Alright thank you all for the information, I will probably use this shorthand for internals because my teachers accept it. Then for externals, I'll use the words.

hi, i was wondering if its allowed to write to denote sum of roots, instead of writing "sum of roots: " (sorry im lazy) and for sum of roots 2 at a time etc. though i'm not sure how i would express the product of roots like that, ill probably just write that one. thankyou

long division is so painful, you have to write too much. synthetic division is good though

basically you just compare coefficients usually for cubics its very easy, you just look at the coefficients of x and what it has to add up to. i think there are videos online. nah im not accelerating im just learning ahead a bit :)

amazing thank you

hey, just checking is this allowed in the hsc for 4u and possibly 3u? Like if the question doesn't specify "using long division". thank you