Search results

Re: Top 20 in Course List Yes, though how likely that is will depend on how competitive the candidature is. @vmoore, we're not allowed to publicly post the pdf link here, it's embargoed. It's not that difficult to find it if you search.

Re: Top 20 in Course List Yes. They only specified equal ranks for equal first. Others are unknown.

Re: Top 20 in Course List Your claim is correct, fourth in the state indeed. Congratulations.

Re: Top 20 in Course List +1 Control of information, lol?

Re: Top 20 in Course List 20th, unless I can't count. Probably some equal ranks in there, but it doesn't say who's equal with whom, unless it's equal 1st.

Re: Top 20 in Course List To be honest, I don't think it's that big a deal. If it's embargoed, and they want links pulled, fine by me. Truth is, it's already out there, and it's not difficult to find if you search properly or ask the right people. Not posting links publicly here is up to the...

Re: Top 20 in Course List The list was part of the HSC insert they'll have in the Thursday copy of the Herald. It was on the SMH website, but it was pulled because it's supposed to be embargoed. Unfortunately, this is the intertubes we're talking about here.

Re: Top 20 in Course List Y'all know how it is...stuff doesn't get un-leaked on the interwebs. 5 people equal first for 2U maths? Wow...

Nothing terribly important that one can't find within the brochure anyway. xD I just got some good advice on how to respond to the questions, stuff like writing about personal experiences and all that.

Some stats I got from a person from UNSW when I went to the careers day: Last year, there were: 630 applications (people applying) 119 places available 1786 preferences 497 interviews I have no way of verifying these numbers, or whether these were for the whole Co-op program or merely the...

There was an initial black-out (complete black-out) for a few seconds. Then some dim back-up lights came online. About 10 minutes later, power was restored to the main lights in the room.

I thought that's what TT/ACA always did, like immigrant Asians taking Australian jobs and whatnot. Storm in a teacup, I say.

Certainly. Although, it's obviously up to the Board to take that course of action. In which case, there's nothing else to debate. Go to sleep or something.

Scusi, the statement did not say that extra time was given. I thought we were debating over the extra time that *was* given. My apologies if I interpreted the call for evidence incorrectly. Yeah, save the pandas. edit: for clarification

Ain't much of it, except word from anyone who was in the exam room.

QFT @eno: Hey, that's what they'll do, you know! Actually, I'd like to see some real debate. In SMH or something.

Since when did that stop TT or ACA? In fact, it's probably better there's no visual, they can make one up.

Thanks, that was some time ago though. To each their own, indeed. Anyway, what's the course of action, if any? Looking at what's happened to this thread, I'm not sure if anyone's serious about doing anything about it.

A few people do. Maybe 3 or 4, I'm not sure.

What kind of concessions were suggested? Re-sitting a test? Not likely. Docking marks off people? Then how would one decide who was advantaged by the extra 15 minutes and who wasn't? Typing a few words into Google is the way of the stalker, isn't it? ;-) Anyway, thanks to the media release...