Search results

Mate there's already one (hehe, and I'm working to expand it), but it's at www.uninotes.com.au

i had a little bit of an odd uai: 2004 software design and development 89 2005 physics 85 2006 maths adv 94, maths ext 39, english adv 86, ipt 93 sam predicted: 94.90 actual uai was: 95.40 (a welcome shock!)

I liked how at the bottom of the page it had "Sincerely, Bank of Australia customer trust department" - gotta love that trust department

Atq :)

the email question was dodgy.. was i the only one who said one of the reasons it was fake was the bad spelling? i mean, 'notifikation'...

Bob, i had 2 different answers: 15. A (the system was built with partial functionality, but it was tried just in one region, so it was either phased or pilot, i put pilot though, the second part was obviously direct, so i put A instead of C) and 19. B (there was an error with the...

NB: edited answer and question fiber optic: advantages: fast, doesn't suffer from interference as it uses light instead of electrical signals. drawbacks: expensive, breaks easily twisted pair: advantages: cheap, reliable drawbacks: needs more repeaters due to copper's properties, can suffer...

that looks like a bit of a dodgy question, i'd answer it by perhaps looking at midi files, saying they're instructions as opposed to the actual sound (as in, with midi files the actual notes to be played are stored, not the sound of the notes)... i'd like to know how anyone else would approach...

in the other threads they were talking about getting 60-70, being a band 6.. i thought they meant 60-70%, not out of 84 :) i answered only about 60% of questions... god scaling better be good... it was really just a test on everything i sucked at, i was getting 80% in the other exams, but wasn't...

i found it shocking... shocking... i didn't answer any of question 6 :) but questions 1-5 i did ok in, question 7 was shocking too... overall aiming for around about 50% raw.. what do you think that'll scale to given the difficulty of this exam?

i've lost mine... so, please donate your spare stimulus booklets my way so i can undergo the important rite of passage of burning one...

ah that's brilliant, thanks very much

I reckon it's worth a try, i mean, i thought i did realy well in my physics exam, but somehow got a lower mark than my assessments, so i'm willing to spend $12 just to try it... and i have heard of one person who had their marks changed, by a substantial amount too and i'm sorry to repost...

hmmm, i'm in physics and wanted to do a recheck, but with the form: http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/syllabus_hsc/pdf_doc/clerical_recheck_notice.pdf it asks for the course number... does anyone know where i can find the course number for physics? i've looked all over but i can't see...

oh... well, there you go...

It didn't explode :) haven't you seen apollo 13? does seeing that give me an unfair advantage? i just wrote about the slingshot effect... and about how physics saved them... that should impress the markers...

thanks xrtzx, i got that bit wrong, but i got the same answer for the proton stuff...

the decay stuff... i just guessed... i figured the Th one had to be less than 238... so i have a 1/238 chance of getting it right... can't remember what i did after that, but i'm pretty sure it involved failing... actually i didn't think i did too badly altogether, but that exam was a real...

having no projectile motion questions was really a let down, they are usually a few gauranteed marks that everyone else has trouble getting... we had our q2q questions changed slightly, stuff about the uncertainty principle and exclusion principle don't expect the exams to be loaded up...

oh god... what's wrong with you people, last year's cssa trials were easy, these ones were not... maybe it was just for me, there were certain things i decided not to study (concentrating on what i felt i needed to spend more time on), every last one of them was in the exam, it was like a...