Finding the gradient question (1 Viewer)

superbird

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Messages
774
Location
sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Was the 2nd last question of the exam...
wat did everybody get as the gradient, i got around 3.5...
and for k i think i got around 5.6
 

xprshn

bum...
Joined
Sep 2, 2004
Messages
88
Location
the west !
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Yeah i got gradient as 3.5,
but i got k constant as 1.75x10^-7... <== close to the real value of 2x10^-7 right?
 

SeDaTeD

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2004
Messages
571
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
i got gradient 3.6 x10^-6, and k = 1.8 x10^-7
and i put in units too.
 

acmilan

I'll stab ya
Joined
May 24, 2004
Messages
3,989
Location
Jumanji
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Pretty much the same as SeDaTeD

and for the equation of k i got k = (md)/(I(1)l) (gradient*distance/current in 1*length)
 

Komaticom

Bored Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
589
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Uni Grad
2008
I misinterpretted I2 to be I squared, so I couldn't the question.
For the last part I referred to my data sheet and pulled out the precise k value.
 

BillyMak

Silent majority
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
443
Location
Randwick
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
The gradient wasn't ~3.5*10^-6, it was just ~3.5 since the y- axis was Force (10^-6 N).
 

acmilan

I'll stab ya
Joined
May 24, 2004
Messages
3,989
Location
Jumanji
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I took that into consideration and decided on using just 3.5 as the gradient
 

Steven12

Lord Chubbington
Joined
Mar 5, 2004
Messages
407
Location
sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Yes, but you had to use 3.5*10^-6 when calculating k.
i Know, when i first got 3.6 as gradient, note how the last question asks to sub in the gradient to get the constant, i got a really large number.

so i put 3.6*10-6 for the gradient.
 

BillyMak

Silent majority
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
443
Location
Randwick
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
I reckon they could accept both answers, it was only worth like 1 or 2 marks.
 

Shifty

Bulldogs 04' Premiers
Joined
Oct 31, 2003
Messages
203
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
what did ya's do to get the gradient?
 

BillyMak

Silent majority
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
443
Location
Randwick
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
rise/run

I used all of the points they gave to get about 5 gradients, all ~3.5, then I just took the average.
 

kunny funt

Large Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
153
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
yeah i did it from the line of best fit, but i didnt put the x 10^-6 just left it, i only x 10^-6 in the next two parts.

i will lose a mark for that.
 

BillyMak

Silent majority
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
443
Location
Randwick
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
I don't think you'd lose a mark for that. Strictly speaking, since Force was in 10^-6 Newtons, and Current was in single amps, this was marked on the scale. So the gradient of the line was in fact 3.5, i.e. 1 unit across, 3.5 units up, even if the units were tweaked in order to produce a nicer looking graph.
 

Xayma

Lacking creativity
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
5,953
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Yes you should have then realised that F/I2=m*10^-6
 

Jase

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
724
Location
Behind You
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
k , 0.18 x 10^-6 NA^-2

which is about equal to 2 x 10^-7 like in the sheet..
 

lucyinthehole

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Messages
256
i got what someone on the first page did: gradient=3.5 x 10^-6, (but for units i forgot to put A^2, and so just got N/A) and k=1.75 x 10^whatever the real value is to the power off, can't remember. so it's pretty close to the actual value
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top