ashjw84 said:
Is there any difference between doing an undergraduate law degree compared to a graduate law degree (i mean not masters or phd, just graduate law) ? do employers look at it any different ?
thanks.......
Some have posted that students in graduate law are stuck in a different class. I'm not sure why because you would still need to complete a similar number of subjects as you would in an undergraduate combined law degree (from my vague understanding).
To qualify as a lawyer (if that is a person's wish), you need to complete around eleven core subjects (the Priestley eleven, not to be mistaken with Oceans Eleven!) so you will need to satisfy this requirement regardless of whether it is a graduate or undergraduate law degree.
As for whether employers will look at it different, I think that will be difficult to say. They might see it in the context of your undergraduate degree in the same light as one would with a combined degree. They may ask, however, 'why you decided to pursue law after you finished a degree in <other discipline>. It's not negative at all, just a different way of asking a similar question with a combined degree. As a result, I don't imagine why employers would view it differently.