induction question (1 Viewer)

tutor01

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
46
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Can anyone prove by induction that

n(x+a)^(n-1) = sum_{r=0}^{n} r . nCr . x^(r-1) . a^(n-r) for n=1,2,3,...

Thanks.
 

ultra908

Active Member
Joined
May 11, 2019
Messages
128
Gender
Male
HSC
2020
Uh can you send a photo or write in Latex because your equation is a bit hard to understand.
 

CM_Tutor

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
1,410
Unless required to prove this by induction, this is an excellent example of where an alternative method is much easier.

This result is the direct application of differentiation to the binomial theorem.

The binomial theorem states that

Differentiating with respect to x yields:

Noting the term in the sum is zero when , we have: as required


Something to bear in mind here: Questions sometimes use the word "otherwise", as in "Using induction or otherwise, prove ...". The word "otherwise" pretty much always indicates that either there is an alternative method that is much quicker, or that there is an alternative approach that will lead to a huge mess and you should avoid it. A question with a preferable "otherwise" approach offers the chance to pick up time in an exam, which you can then use on other questions. It is worth stopping to consider when the word "otherwise" appears and asking if a better way is available.
 

harrowed2

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
69
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Unless required to prove this by induction, this is an excellent example of where an alternative method is much easier.

This result is the direct application of differentiation to the binomial theorem.

The binomial theorem states that

Differentiating with respect to x yields:

Noting the term in the sum is zero when , we have: as required


Something to bear in mind here: Questions sometimes use the word "otherwise", as in "Using induction or otherwise, prove ...". The word "otherwise" pretty much always indicates that either there is an alternative method that is much quicker, or that there is an alternative approach that will lead to a huge mess and you should avoid it. A question with a preferable "otherwise" approach offers the chance to pick up time in an exam, which you can then use on other questions. It is worth stopping to consider when the word "otherwise" appears and asking if a better way is available.
Yes, the question came from the new Maths in Focus Ext 2 textbook in ch 5 Mathematical Induction Exercise 5.04 Q3 part b.
 

Pedro123

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2019
Messages
91
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
Heads up - using the method of differentiation (Which is significantly easier) and induction for such problems is quite common in a lot of 3 unit exams, so just make sure you are aware of that process
 

5uMath

Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2019
Messages
68
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Yes, the question came from the new Maths in Focus Ext 2 textbook in ch 5 Mathematical Induction Exercise 5.04 Q3 part b.
Would you be able to share a copy of that textbook, perhaps online through google drive? I know I'm late ahaha, but I'm really limited on resources.
 

harrowed2

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
69
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Heads up - using the method of differentiation (Which is significantly easier) and induction for such problems is quite common in a lot of 3 unit exams, so just make sure you are aware of that process
Yes, I would have normally have solved this question with differentiation, but the textbook asked for the statement to be proved using Mathematical Induction, and was a "hence prove" follow on from part a.
 

5uMath

Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2019
Messages
68
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Yes, I would have normally have solved this question with differentiation, but the textbook asked for the statement to be proved using Mathematical Induction, and was a "hence prove" follow on from part a.
Would you say the new maths in focus for 4u is good?
 

Drdusk

π
Moderator
Joined
Feb 24, 2017
Messages
1,367
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Uni Grad
2023
Would you say the new maths in focus for 4u is good?
Maths in focus was never good. I haven't seen the book but I'm 99.9% sure it's trash like all the other ones.

The only thing it's 'sort of'? good for is explaining concepts from what I hear through other students.
 

ultra908

Active Member
Joined
May 11, 2019
Messages
128
Gender
Male
HSC
2020
Would you say the new maths in focus for 4u is good?
i'd say the difficulty level isn't up to cambridge or fitzpatrick. Cambridge exercises have 3 levels of difficulty and maths in focus ends at like the first level lol.
 

CM_Tutor

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
1,410
Maths in focus was never good. I haven't seen the book but I'm 99.9% sure it's trash like all the other ones.

The only thing it's 'sort of'? good for is explaining concepts from what I hear through other students.
It's my understanding that the new syllabus Maths in Focus is better than the older ones written by Margaret Grove... but I agree that the old books were not good books.
 
Last edited:

harrowed2

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
69
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Would you say the new maths in focus for 4u is good?
It's ok, does some topics well, but has some material that is not covered by the others, which adds to the confusion of what to concentrate on. My pick is the new Cambridge text, followed by Fitzpatrick Ed 3 and the new Terry Lee.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top