Limit problem (1 Viewer)

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
let's say I wanted to evaluate the limit:

lim[x-->0+] (-2x<sup>2</sup>Sec<sup>2</sup>[x])/(Tan[x])
And did this:

= lim[x-->0+] (-2Sec<sup>2</sup>[x]) * lim[x-->0+] (x<sup>2</sup>)/(Tan[x])

Is there anything wrong with that?
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
No, I'm asking if that step is legitamite. Obviously the limit is zero just by intuition (notice the coefficient of x/tan[x], which is 1, sec[x], which is 1, and a remaining x, which is zero)
 

turtle_2468

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
408
Location
North Shore, Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
As long as the one you're taking out doesn't do dodgy stuff like go to 0 or infinity, I think you're fine. In this case, take out sec blah, which is a constant (ie 2)...
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Yeah, and they marked me down in an assignment for it.

"Needs more explanation"

F*cking bastards, they've done this to me time and time again.

I DON'T WANT TO DUMB DOWN MY ANSWERS. THERE'S A REASON I GET THEM RIGHT.
 

jm1234567890

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2002
Messages
6,516
Location
Stanford, CA
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
well, you don't really know if the thing your taking out is going to exist or not untill you have evaluated it.

So i guess you need to explain it.
 

turtle_2468

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
408
Location
North Shore, Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
But you need to EXPLAIN why it's a valid step. Without explanation many things could go down the drain... eg take a dodgy proof. The only way people could be convinced that your proof was right without you writing that bit down is by knowing that you NORMALLY would think of that step... which has a few pitfalls
1) You use up your goodwill quite quickly
2) If you normally wouldn't think of that step, they wouldn't give you the mark and would think you're fudging. Which means they're discriminating based on students and not assignments, which is dodgy...

I reckon that step was sufficiently non-obvious if part of an assignment to warrant at least a short explanation... doesn't matter whether you get it right, it's the proof that counts
 

turtle_2468

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
408
Location
North Shore, Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
JM...:Yeah, 3 units... which isn't much, but it's better than nothing. Plus it keeps my brain ticking over...
well, keypad, 1/2 a mark... don't worry yourself overly about it. Non-standard solutions are always tricky to mark anyway... but it's a bit of an art to figure out where others might have trouble understanding your proof. :) GOod luck for your next assignment, I have cramming to do...
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
I've learnt that the best way to do everything is to treat the marker like a 2 year old. Spoon feed everything, copy proofs. Don't assume they know anything that can be assumed in the course. Then you CAN'T lose a mark.
 

Estel

Tutor
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
1,261
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Nice to know I won't feel any culture shock in university...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top