Tennis and Bruce McAvaney (1 Viewer)

OMGITzJustin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
1,002
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Anyone else find his comments absolutely pointless? They are so frustrating and blatantly obvious, and I find all he does is recall what happened in the match and offers no analysis at all. For example today Nadal vs Berdych - "set point" "hes going to have to serve it out for the set" "break point" "second double fault for the game, they're not serving very well" "holds to love"... he says NOTHING apart from repeating scores, and if hes not repeating scores hes stating the obvious

EDIT: that last point by nadal, roger and jim are talking about court position, how low he gets and body strength required to get that shot. thats what we want to hear, instead of the score that we can clearly see ourselves.
 
Last edited:

b00m

Active Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
2,777
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Uni Grad
2014
phil gould is a terrible commentator.

a fantastic analyst of the game but terrible commentator. he and rabs get wayy too off topic sometimes with knitting and god knows what

as for bruce mcaveny i have to agree. Courier to me is the only one who offers great insight
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
3,411
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Uni Grad
2013
Tbh I don't really like the idea of play by play commentators at all
Analyst 5eva

But I guess others disagree
 

b00m

Active Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
2,777
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Uni Grad
2014
Tbh I don't really like the idea of play by play commentators at all
Analyst 5eva

But I guess others disagree
u dont have play by play commentators in tennis though. all the commentary is after the point. so pretty much u have to be a good analyst to commentate tennis
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
3,411
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Uni Grad
2013
u dont have play by play commentators in tennis though. all the commentary is after the point. so pretty much u have to be a good analyst to commentate tennis
true, should have said commentators that dont really add anything as well

also Courier is gr8 imo
 

DavDav

Where is the Love?
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
152
Location
집 ... Zzzz
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Uni Grad
2015
Bruce McAvaney reminds me of American commentators on ESPN.

'Its in the net!'

'Nice work!'

'Excellent play!'

Just a series of generic B.S. statements made up by pea brained idiots to stall time and break the awkwardness of having to sit in a small room with another man/woman you've just met for a couple of hours.

We should have professionals of the game commentating like Courier. He's decent.

Henri Leconte is just crazy hahaha. :awesome:

I wouldn't mind seeing Federer doing it after he retires.
 

noworriez1

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2011
Messages
456
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
there is nothing wrong with bruce mcaveny

sure, he may point out the obvious occasionally

but i sure as hell would hate it if all i heard were ball pops throughout the entire game

When Jim Courier isn't speaking, McAveny says a thing or two (but never dominates it with plain gibberish all the time). He always gives Courier time to speak, and when he isn't, he throws in a comment or two, which makes it a tad more engaging than utter silence

the commentators during the day, for the female matches, are terrible

Jim Courier is, no doubt, better... but McAveny adds a nice touch to the game. His voice, especially, is soft and mellow in comparison to the terrible american commentators that feel so fake in the way they speak (typical)

And Roger Rasheed is... decent, at best.
Just my two cents

Also, just a side-point, Berdych, last night, played the better game and should have beaten Nadal (imo). Nadal only relies on unforced errors, which Berdych made over 50 as opposed to nadal that made almost half that.
It frustrates me, is all.
 

b00m

Active Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
2,777
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Uni Grad
2014
yes i supposed he does add balance to the commentary, more aimed at the general population who have little knowledge of tennis
 

converge

Member
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
78
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Henri Leconte is just crazy hahaha. :awesome:
Haha crazy and biased at the same time. If you guys think Bruce McAvaney is bad, have a look at Sandy Roberts. These commentators just love the sound of their own voice.
 

gunnerz

New Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Messages
16
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
he is so out of his depth, is what happens when channel seven uses him to commentate 15 different sports (lol)

he commentates a lot of the matches too even the womens (makarova vs sharapova)
 

kaz1

et tu
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
6,960
Location
Vespucci Beach
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
Uni Grad
2018
I loved it when he called Nicholas Mahut a "journeyman" and Jim Courier full ripped into him saying that is insulting and he is a professional tennis player.

McAvaney was about to cry.
 

gunnerz

New Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Messages
16
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
imagine an Azarenka, Sharapova final, they will blow the roof off (definitely watching it on mute)
 

mirakon

nigga
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
4,222
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Anyone else find his comments absolutely pointless? They are so frustrating and blatantly obvious, and I find all he does is recall what happened in the match and offers no analysis at all. For example today Nadal vs Berdych - "set point" "hes going to have to serve it out for the set" "break point" "second double fault for the game, they're not serving very well" "holds to love"... he says NOTHING apart from repeating scores, and if hes not repeating scores hes stating the obvious

EDIT: that last point by nadal, roger and jim are talking about court position, how low he gets and body strength required to get that shot. thats what we want to hear, instead of the score that we can clearly see ourselves.
thats the point. commentary teams have to be balanced with at least 1 person giving play by play analysis and the other having a sort of "historian" role. Its the same for pretty much every commentary team for any sport
 

gunnerz

New Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Messages
16
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
thats the point. commentary teams have to be balanced with at last 1 person giving play by play analysis and the other having a sort of "historian" role. Its the same for pretty much every commentary team for any sport[/QUOTEi

yes but the main commentator also has to know his stuff and stats(ie martin tyler in soccer) McAvaney is clueless.Sam Smith was providing the hardcore stats (that you will expect from the main commentator) and analysis in the wozniacki and clijsters match: Bruce Mcavaney asked who was the last counterpunch player to win a grand slam (refering to wozniacki ability to win a slam with her style of play) and bang Sam Smith says 2004 Anastasia Myskina
 
Last edited:

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Not sure if I've ever heard of a sports commentator I did like. In cricket the late Peter Roebuck was quite pleasant I suppose.
 

kaz1

et tu
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
6,960
Location
Vespucci Beach
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
Uni Grad
2018
Peter Roebuck raped adolescent Zimbabwean young men, there was a big smh article about it,
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top