frinkanator
Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2006
- Messages
- 32
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2004
Hehe, here comes the barrage of flames. If I did come across as arrogant and mean, that certainly wasn’t what I was intending to show. I guess sarcasm on the internet has it’s limitations with some individuals.
I am just retaliating to a lot of the IB bashing from a lot of you. And it seems as I began to play on accounting stereotypes, a lot of you fan boys became quite defensive. go figure.
You can call me a first-year pleb, just some noob who has nothing to show for… whatever you please, but I’m certainly not talking through my arse. I certainly didn't say anyone not in IB cannot become successful. What I did mean is that many of you place too much emphasis on the salary and social life and how it isn't worth working that hard for that much. Your focus on the so-called shitty aspects of IB is irrelevant, especially with the flexibility of changing departments, ranks, specialty in industry, starting your own firm. I view accounting jobs with more of a permanent desk job role.
A lot of you talk like you know a lot, done some cadetships maybe even talked to some in the big4/IB's. And yes it is bloody hard... the hours are long... social life is sacrificed, but to many (including myself) it is viewed as merely a particularly hard rung in the ladder to the top. Like most graduate jobs, you start at the bottom in the shits and make your way up. It ain't working in the mines until you're 50 and dead, new blood is always turned over and the cycle continues. If you really are challenged, you move onto bigger and better things.
I know this particular ex-IB'er who has been through the whole process, did it tough, but managed to get himself set up very nicely in the stock market thanks to his decent salary and industry associates, now has his own investment firm, managing portoflios in the hundreds of millions at the age of 28. Now if he was an accountant instead, earning less, would he able to gear up large investments to build his wealth? Would his industry know-how in investment be not as strong? It certainly would be questionable.
Cheers.
I am just retaliating to a lot of the IB bashing from a lot of you. And it seems as I began to play on accounting stereotypes, a lot of you fan boys became quite defensive. go figure.
You can call me a first-year pleb, just some noob who has nothing to show for… whatever you please, but I’m certainly not talking through my arse. I certainly didn't say anyone not in IB cannot become successful. What I did mean is that many of you place too much emphasis on the salary and social life and how it isn't worth working that hard for that much. Your focus on the so-called shitty aspects of IB is irrelevant, especially with the flexibility of changing departments, ranks, specialty in industry, starting your own firm. I view accounting jobs with more of a permanent desk job role.
A lot of you talk like you know a lot, done some cadetships maybe even talked to some in the big4/IB's. And yes it is bloody hard... the hours are long... social life is sacrificed, but to many (including myself) it is viewed as merely a particularly hard rung in the ladder to the top. Like most graduate jobs, you start at the bottom in the shits and make your way up. It ain't working in the mines until you're 50 and dead, new blood is always turned over and the cycle continues. If you really are challenged, you move onto bigger and better things.
I know this particular ex-IB'er who has been through the whole process, did it tough, but managed to get himself set up very nicely in the stock market thanks to his decent salary and industry associates, now has his own investment firm, managing portoflios in the hundreds of millions at the age of 28. Now if he was an accountant instead, earning less, would he able to gear up large investments to build his wealth? Would his industry know-how in investment be not as strong? It certainly would be questionable.
Actually, I would find it quite challenging. The experience and relationships would be worth much more than the handsome paycheck. if you're just getting into the industry with that mindset of doing it all for the $$$, then you obviously shouldn't be there and are doing a great disservice to yourself and those around you. You'd be better off auditing statements.turtleface said:True, I think I would rather earn more rather than have a "fake" social life. I mean, true, I'd rather double my salary for the sake of some crappy friday night drinks and boring weekends. But I think you can only say that frinkanator because you haven't experienced what its like to go flat out. Imagine attending uni 16 hours a day, 7 days a week. Can you handle it? What if I gave you $100,000 to do it?
In my opinion, welcome to the Investment Banking dilemma.
I was moderately trading stocks back then, took a gap year last after a drastic career change, to work and educate myself on options and CFD trading. I now actively trade my family's portfolio.turtleface said:shows how rigorous the selection criteria is for traders lol . So you've been a trader since Yr 11 or so yeah?
Cheers.