Curve Sketching (1 Viewer)

Deliriously

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
187
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
How do you sketch
(where a is a constant)
using implicit differentiation?

this is from the Cambridge 3U book
Thanks!
 
Last edited:

barbernator

Active Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
1,439
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
<a href="http://www.codecogs.com/eqnedit.php?latex=x^3 @plus; y^3 = a^3\\*3x^2 @plus;3y^2dy/dx = 0\\*dy/dx=-x^2/y^2\\d^2y/dx^2 = \frac{-2x(y^2)-(2ydy/dx)(-x^2)}{y^4}\\ = \frac{-2xy^2@plus;2xy^2(-x^2/y^2)}{y^4}\\= \frac{-2x(1-\frac{x^2}{y^2})}{y^2}" target="_blank"><img src="http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?x^3 + y^3 = a^3\\*3x^2 +3y^2dy/dx = 0\\*dy/dx=-x^2/y^2\\d^2y/dx^2 = \frac{-2x(y^2)-(2ydy/dx)(-x^2)}{y^4}\\ = \frac{-2xy^2+2xy^2(-x^2/y^2)}{y^4}\\= \frac{-2x(1-\frac{x^2}{y^2})}{y^2}" title="x^3 + y^3 = a^3\\*3x^2 +3y^2dy/dx = 0\\*dy/dx=-x^2/y^2\\d^2y/dx^2 = \frac{-2x(y^2)-(2ydy/dx)(-x^2)}{y^4}\\ = \frac{-2xy^2+2xy^2(-x^2/y^2)}{y^4}\\= \frac{-2x(1-\frac{x^2}{y^2})}{y^2}" /></a>

i think that is correct.

from these equations, (0,a) is a horizontal point of inflection. and grad is always negative, or undefined. So at (a,0) the gradient is undefined, so it must be a vertical gradient.
as x -> +- infinity, the graph approaches y=-x

graph.png

that is what it should look like. Hopefully someone can confirm or deny
 
Last edited:

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
How do you sketch
(where a is a constant)
using implicit differentiation?

this is from the Cambridge 3U book
Thanks!
This is actually more of an Extension 2 question:



Make y the subject of the expression:



Take the limit as x approaches infinity:



So we can see that as x approaches plus/minus infinity, the curve models the line y=-x. This implies that y=-x is an oblique asymptote.

We can verify this by subbing y=-x into our expression for the implicit derivative, which gives us:



We can also see from the implicit derivative that we have a horizontal tangent when:



Similarly for vertical tangents, we let the implicit derivative be infinity ie: the denominator is zero.

Using a similar method, we acquire an x intercept AND a vertical tangent at (a,0)

So from our information that we have deduced algebraically, we have the following diagram:



We observe that the equation of the curve is symmetrical ie: x --> y yields the same curve as y --> x

So we 'suspect' that the curve is symmetric about the line y=x (We can already sorta see it from the diagram!)

So let us solve the equation of the curve with the equation y = x to perhaps find this 'point of symmetry'. We will do so by letting y=x:



So adding this to our diagram, we have:



And that is our curve!

If you sketch the curve for a = 1, 2, 3, etc etc and superimpose them upon each other, you acquire the following contour curves for the surface:





And as you can see for all of them, they all have the asymptote y=-x.

Hope this helps.
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Haha sorry, I just assumed that a>0 was a condition for some reason.

It would be the exact same thing, but reflected about the other side of the line y=-x.
 

Deliriously

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
187
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Ohhh i understand it it now!
It wasn't too bad but I didn't think it would turn out that complicated.
Thank you for both of your contributions! :D
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top