Yes those were the only two that I had trouble with. I wrote about the different types of income earners and where abouts they lived in Sydney.Only two problems (I think):
1. What did people write for the social structure of a developed city?
2. Can someone explain what exactly a linkage is?
Yeah, I wrote about different income areas in London and made up some bullshit for the linkages.Yes those were the only two that I had trouble with. I wrote about the different types of income earners and where abouts they lived in Sydney.
For the linkages question I didnt have a clue but I wrote about how accommodation was necessary and transport too and how the airline companies recommend car hire to the destination and also accommodation, I was stumped but thought I should write something.
Also If people have their multiple choice answers feel free to share as I want to know which ones I got right and wrong.
Well it's a dynamic so it will be fine as long as you only talked about it in the context on one suburb/townAhh that makes sense Dash8 hopefully ill get a few marks for that one:S That was worth 6 though wasnt it?
Yeah I chose 15 and 26, I was strapped for time though, I could have written so much more for the essays if I had more time.
Alsoo there was a question on one urban dynamic for a regional or urban place. Is exurbanisation right?
Sweet, yeah I just did it for Sydney.Well it's a dynamic so it will be fine as long as you only talked about it in the context on one suburb/town
i got 100 for the vertical exagerattion and 27.7777 for the gradientSweet, yeah I just did it for Sydney.
Yeahhh that cross section was so bad I wouldnt have got full marks for it as I just guesstimated in the middle of the two points. What did you get for gradient and stuff, I forget the questions.
Hahah you sound like you wrote a shitload, I was tempted to write about multiculturalism but I didnt have time. I also didnt use specific exams I just said North, East etc as I dont know any names of places in Sydney.for the social structure thing i spoke about classes nd how distinct classes are emerging throughout sydney due to flows - flows of wealth, employment and education. then i spoke about geographic polarisation and how affluent residents are residing in specific areas of the city and how the poorer are in other parts. and then about spatial inequalities and the nature of sydneys multicultural landscape. but i really dont know what i do half the time, im off my face.
How could it be 27.7? That means it would go 27.7 metres up for every metre across?i got 100 for the vertical exagerattion and 27.7777 for the gradient
I'm not saying my answer is right (I never get these ones right) but gradients can be negative. It started at 185 metres high (the mountain) and goes down to 50 metres high (the lighthouse), correct? So, the rise is -135.gradient = rise/run
so it was like 1:27
I'm pretty sure it can't be negative lol
Well it would be 185-50, which equals 135I'm not saying my answer is right (I never get these ones right) but gradients can be negative. It started at 185 metres high (the mountain) and goes down to 50 metres high (the lighthouse), correct? So, the rise is -135.