Electromagnetic, because it definitely wasn't heat, sound, or light.
(That's the question you're asking about, right?)
-
Looking for HSC notes and resources? Check out our Notes & Resources page
General Thoughts: Science (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Rafy
- Start date
(That's the question you're asking about, right?)
I put one and three because four had oxygen, where is was looking for JUST water.
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2008
- Messages
- 5,284
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
It said impacts on the environment from choosing other resources over fossil fuels, i think you may have read it wrong. Unless it was me who read it wrong?
It's atom.
I put 3 and 4, but I would have preferred an answer that said just 3...
mirakon
nigga
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 4,222
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
Oh that one... yeah I put electromagnetic? Why, what was the other option confusing you Hayzazz?
Wasn't it 1 and 3?
It was something about how mobile phones transmit data.
Yeah I got that as well.
mirakon
nigga
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 4,222
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
That's what I put, but I was a bit confused on that question as well.
FTW
Member
Electromagnetic
1 & 3 coz there was no oxygen in both with water in 3 and no water in 1 so an accurate comparison can be made
+1
Rofl imagine heat..... funny stuff
HUZZAH! Btw i love this forum, its pretty cool. Im gonna stick around more...
Xc3llerator
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2009
- Messages
- 20
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
what was the 1st qs?...was it 100ml cylinder or beaker?
1 had no oxygen or water. You do realise what water is don't you? H2O. Two parts hydrogen, one oxygen. Test tube with water and no oxygen actually had oxygen in it (or else it wouldn't be water!).
mirakon
nigga
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 4,222
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
Exactly, so I inferred if you had one without water and one with it then you could test if it really had an effect on corrosion. At least that's my reasoning, but as I said I'm not sure if it's correct.
Omnipotence
Kendrick Lamar
For extended I wrote that nuclear energy it a more efficient and clean source of energy as it does that produce carbon dioxide that contributes to the green house effect and it does not destroy the ozone, thus not trapping in heat.
For the negative impact on the environment, I wrote that there is no sustainable way of dispossing of nuclear waste. Nuclear energy is produced in a nuclear reactor and can be emitted into the environment, destroying human body and tissues causing diseases such as cancer. The emission of radiation in the environment can cause birth defects in babies as a result the DNA mutates. The nuclear waste can be contaminated in the local resevoir water supply that we drink, causing illness and death. Animals and plants that drink water that was contaminated from nuclear waste can mutate or die, destroying the ecosystem.
For the negative impact on the environment, I wrote that there is no sustainable way of dispossing of nuclear waste. Nuclear energy is produced in a nuclear reactor and can be emitted into the environment, destroying human body and tissues causing diseases such as cancer. The emission of radiation in the environment can cause birth defects in babies as a result the DNA mutates. The nuclear waste can be contaminated in the local resevoir water supply that we drink, causing illness and death. Animals and plants that drink water that was contaminated from nuclear waste can mutate or die, destroying the ecosystem.
Measuring cylinder.
wasn't that the whole point? they only wanted to test if water affected corrosion or not
1 had no water no oxygen, 3 had water and no oxygen
OMG....maybe i read it wrong......
Salliea
Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Messages
- 80
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2011
hm...i got 3 and 4 were one was all water and the other one was oxygen and water :| meh
did anyone get lots of As in the first column for multiple choice? That what some of my friends said they got :| I only remember a lot of Cs and Ds in the second column lol