and i have to put up with this sort of thing at home - my dad is a mathematician - but then his geometry is horrible (he hasn't used it since he did extension 2 (or maths with honours as it was in the 1950s when he was at school) and he can't remember the rule.Sonjay- said:man ... i reckon i aced it... such a piece of cake killed in 1 and a half hours ( not even probably) checke dit 4 times but i still had 3 silly mistakes... im standing on 117 n im sure... how did u go?
note: this is Sonjay-'s first and only post, therefore I assume he is bullshittingSonjay- said:man ... i reckon i aced it... such a piece of cake killed in 1 and a half hours ( not even probably) checke dit 4 times but i still had 3 silly mistakes... im standing on 117 n im sure... how did u go?
completely concur. the mark allocator, whoever he/she is, obviously had a stroke the night before the mark allocation.Originally Posted by yew_315
I reckon it was a shit exam... sure the first 4 questions were pretty easy, but lets face it, that was expected right. Then came the last four that were just crap. Does anyone reckon they allocated marks stupidly? Like 1 mark for like a third of a page proof!!! It was stupid!! That's wat really killed me... the proofs just were time consuming, and weren't worth any major marks. I don't reckon there's anything in there that was insanely hard like the 93' paper, but it just took time to see the answer and work through the problems. Oh well... see how we go....