HSC 2015 MX2 Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kaido

be.
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
823
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Hmm, I'd like to know that last line of Integrand's proof :p
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Well if there is a rational polynomial q(x) of degree < 3 with that root (which we call s), then there must exist such a polynomial m(x) (m for minimal) which divides x^3+3x+1.

Why?

By the division algorithm,

x^3+x+1=q(x)d_1(x)+r_1(x)
q(x)=r_1(x)d_2(x)+r_2(x)
r_1(x)=r_2(x)d_3(x)+r_3(x)
...

with deg(r_j) decreasing and r_j(s)=0 for each j. This process cannot repeat indefinitely, so we must have some r_{n+1}(x)=0, in which case m(x)=r_n(x) satisfies the claim.


So it suffices to show x^3+3x+1 cannot be written as the product of two rational factors of lower degree. (That (x^3+3x+1)/m(x) must also be a rational polynomial follows from that fact that it takes rational values for each integer x. Knowing what a poly does at infinitely many locations allows us to find its coefficients by simultaneous equations which will only involve rational operations.)

One of these factors must be linear, and so x^3+3x+1 must have a rational root. But the rational root theorem tells us this is NOT the case.

Hence x^3+3x+1 is the monic polynomial of least positive degree that annihilates s.
 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,473
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

^
here is my attempt at the last part. The easiest way to do it; for the less intelligent people.
To simplify the algebra I substituted a Q in, and resubstituted it back in, to simplify the algebra a little bit.
I find LATEX time consuming to code, so images.



EDIT: The first line is wrong. It is x^2 -bx +c. It has no effect on the proof.
 
Last edited:

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,473
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

invalid question, amended question is 2 replies down
to see original q see below
 
Last edited:

Kaido

be.
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
823
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Dayum, havent learnt inverse yet... (is this harder 3u?)
 

Kaido

be.
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
823
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Yeah, but the question itself is 4u level, no?
 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,473
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

here is a better question

(A) Solve





(B) Hence using part (A) graph
 
Last edited:

Soulful

HSC Hipster
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Messages
332
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

here is a better question

(A) Solve





(B) Hence using part (A) graph
I'm so confused :S Are we supposed to solve part a) simultaneously? Cause I did and I got x=0 and I have no idea how this can be used in part B)
 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,473
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

I'm so confused :S Are we supposed to solve part a) simultaneously? Cause I did and I got x=0 and I have no idea how this can be used in part B)
yes you are supposed to solve it simultaenously...
part (b) is addition of two curves
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,657
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

self made question =16 people are to be seated around two square tables each side has 2 seats. In how many ways can two specific people sit on the same side
 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,473
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

A, B and 14 other people.
A sits anywhere on the table.
B has one option to sit next to him
so the answer is
16 * the permutation of the remaining 14 people in 14 seats
so is 16!/15
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,657
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

remember that you can arrange other people aswell
 

Ekman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
1,616
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

self made question =16 people are to be seated around two square tables each side has 2 seats. In how many ways can two specific people sit on the same side
2 Specific people are chosen from 16. Each table has 8 people.
Group the 2 specific people and put them on one side of the table. Therefore there are 6 seats remaining on Table 1
2! different ways to arrange between the two grouped specific people.
14C6 * 6! different ways to choose and arrange between the 6 other people on the table.
8C8 * 8! different ways to choose and arrange the remaining people on Table 2.
2*14C6*6!*8!*= 1.744 x 10^11 different ways of doing this.
 

Ekman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
1,616
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Or another method is:
2*14! since we lock in 2 people (they are arranged amongst themselves) and there are 14 people remaining to be arranged, thus 2 * 14! = 1.744 x 10^11 (the more easier approach, but I like to show what is going on for permutations)
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,657
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

close but you have to select them before arranging. Solution:
Lock people a and b on one side and then arrange them 1x2! but you still have to fill up the other spots... therfore 2!x(14C2)x2!x(12C2)x2!..... take 2 factorial out and then type it into your calculator you get 1362160800 and since there is 8 side you multiply by 8 to get 1.09x10^10 with the assumption that one can differenciate between sides
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top