Induction and a max/min (1 Viewer)

currysauce

Actuary in the making
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
576
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Prove, by M.I that if n is a whole number then,

n^3 + 3n^2 +2n is divisible by 6

Prove this same result without M.I by first factorising.


2.

A wire of length 100cm is cut into 2 pieces of length x and y. THe peice of length x is bent into the shape of a square and the y peice into a circle. Find x and y such that the sum of the 2 areas will be a minimum.



cheers, (oh and use implicit differentiation for 2).
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
2. x+y=100 (1), since joining the lengths x and y will give your original length, 100cm.

In a square, the four side lengths are equal, but since our perimeter is x, one of the sides will have a length of x/4 cm => Area of square = x2/16 (2)

In a circle, Area=pi.r2 (3)
Circumference = 2.pi.r, where the circumference is y (or 100-x if we rearrange equation 1)
100-x=2pi.r
r=(100-x)/2pi (4)
Substitute (4) into (3):
Area of circle = pi.[(100-x)/2pi]2 (5)
Now we wish to find min. area of the two, so we add equations (5) and (2) and differentiate:
d/dx[(100-x)2/4pi + x2/16] = -2(100-x)/4pi + x/8
Area is a min. when -2(100-x)/4pi + x/8= 0
8x-800+2pi.x = 0
x(8+2pi) = 800
x=400/(4+pi)
.'. y=100-x
=100 - 400/(4+pi)

Note: I didn't need to use implicit differentiation at all, since I changed y into 100-x. ;)
 
Last edited:

currysauce

Actuary in the making
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
576
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Thanks, but i just finished that question myself :D

I did it much mroe easily with implicit, but thankyou very much
 

currysauce

Actuary in the making
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
576
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
nope - cuz i get down to the final step, but i have a 3k^2 - so i can't factor a 6 out...

hmm

and when i factorise i get x(x+1)(x+2)

obviosuly one of these are divisible by 3 - buti don't thnk i can make the assumption that anything divisible by 3 is divible by 6... obviously ...hmm

cuz anything div. by 6 is div. by 3...
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Yes you can. Anything that's divisible by 6, is also divisible by any factor of 6, if you think about it. 6 = 3 x 2
 
I

icycloud

Guest
Required to prove n^3 + 3n^2 + 2n is divisible by 6.

Using induction:
Let S(n) = n^3 + 3n^2 + 2n where n is an element of N

Now, S(1) = 1+3+2 = 6
Thus S(1) is divisible by 6 (i.e. statement true for n = 1)

Assume that S(k) = k^3 + 3k^2 + 2k = 6M where M is an element of Z

Now, S(k+1) = (k+1)^3 + 3(k+1)^2 + 2(k+1)
= k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k + 1 + 3k^2 + 6k + 3 + 2k + 2
= (k^3 + 3k^2 + 2k) + 3k^2 + 9k + 6
= 6M + 3k^2 + 9k + 6 (by the induction hypothesis)
= 6M + 3(k+1)(k+2)

Now if k+1 is odd, then k+2 is even and thus k+2 = 2L where L is an element of Z.
If k+1 is even, then k+1 = 2N where N is an element of Z.

Thus, S(k+1) = 6M + 3(2N)(k+2) = 6{M+N(k+2)}
or S(k+1) = 6M + 3(2L)(k+1) = 6{M+L(k+1)}
In either case, S(k+1) is divisible by 6.

Thus, the statement is true for n=1 and if it is true for n=k then it is true for n=k+1. Thus by the principle of mathematical induction, the statement is true for n=1,2,3,.... for n an element of N.

Without induction (by factorising)
n^3 + 3n^2 + 2n = n(n^2+3n+2) = n(n+1)(n+2)

If n is even, then the statement is divisible by 2.
If n is odd, then n+1 is even and still the statement is divisible by 2.
Thus the statement is divisible by 2 for all n an element of N.

---

Multiples of 3 include 3,6,9,.... forming an arithmetic progression with common difference 3. The k-th term is thus given by T_n = 3k.

Case 1: n=3k+2
Then, n+1=3k+3=3(k+1).
Thus the statement becomes n*3(k+1)(n+2) and because n+1 is odd, both n and n+2 are even. Thus since the statement is divisible by both 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6.

Case 2: n=3k+1
Then, n+2=3k+3=3(k+1)
Thus the statement becomes n(n+1)*3(k+1) and because n+2 is odd, n+1 is even. Thus since the statement is divisible by both 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6.

Case 3: n=3k
Thus the statement becomes 3k(n+1)(n+2) and because n is odd, n+1 is even. Thus since the statement is divisible by both 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6.

In all three cases n=3k,3k+1,3k+2, the statement is divisible by 6.
Thus the statement is divisible by 6 for all n an element of N.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Templar

P vs NP
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
1,979
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
icycloud said:
Without induction (by factorising)
n^3 + 3n^2 + 2n = n(n^2+3n+2) = n(n+1)(n+2)

If n is even, then the statement is divisible by 2.
If n is odd, then n+1 is even and still the statement is divisible by 2.
Thus the statement is divisible by 2 for all n an element of N.

---

Multiples of 3 include 3,6,9,.... forming an arithmetic progression with common difference 3. The k-th term is thus given by T_n = 3k.

Case 1: n=3k+2
Then, n+1=3k+3=3(k+1).
Thus the statement becomes n*3(k+1)(n+2) and because n+1 is odd, both n and n+2 are even. Thus since the statement is divisible by both 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6.

Case 2: n=3k+1
Then, n+2=3k+3=3(k+1)
Thus the statement becomes n(n+1)*3(k+1) and because n+2 is odd, n+1 is even. Thus since the statement is divisible by both 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6.

Case 3: n=3k
Thus the statement becomes 3k(n+1)(n+2) and because n is odd, n+1 is even. Thus since the statement is divisible by both 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6.

In all three cases n=3k,3k+1,3k+2, the statement is divisible by 6.
Thus the statement is divisible by 6 for all n an element of N.
A simplified solution:

Since n, n+1 and n+2 are consecutive integers, at least one must be divisible by two and exactly one by three. QED
 
I

icycloud

Guest
Templar said:
Since n, n+1 and n+2 are consecutive integers, at least one must be divisible by two and exactly one by three. QED
Yup that's what I proved. But you can't really just state that without a proof, right?
Or maybe you can... who knows.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top