There was also a condition that a>0
i was thinking either integrate the equation from 0 to 1 using integration by parts letting u=e^x and v'=x^a, that gives something with a denominator of (a+1) which is wat we want, but I cant quite get that answer. Infact it is quite far from it
The other method i was thinking was like graphing it and looking from 0 to 1. because at x=0, y=0 and at x=1, y=e. So the graph is definitely smaller than the rectangle which has area e. Since a>0, then 0 < 3/(a+1) < 3.
Therefore since the area under the graph from 0 to 1 is always <e, and 3/(a+1) <3, then area under the graph is always smaller than 3/(a+1)?
r any of those methods rite?
if not, does any1 have any other ideas?