history essay due tomorrow, i just don't have enogh in it.
I've gotta say how reliable Tacitus' annals and Cassius' roman history are regarding the reasons that caused boudicca's revolt.
I've said that Tacitus talks of personal reasons and Cassius talks of national reasons, and i've done background info on both men, i've written that tacitus was alive at the time and his father-in-law was staff of the govenor of Briton at the time, and said their reliable in how both sources agree on certain facts (like boudiccas existance and that shes royalty), and ive touched on propaganda. . . but this isn't enough, i havn't reached the word limit so i need more points =] please help
I've gotta say how reliable Tacitus' annals and Cassius' roman history are regarding the reasons that caused boudicca's revolt.
I've said that Tacitus talks of personal reasons and Cassius talks of national reasons, and i've done background info on both men, i've written that tacitus was alive at the time and his father-in-law was staff of the govenor of Briton at the time, and said their reliable in how both sources agree on certain facts (like boudiccas existance and that shes royalty), and ive touched on propaganda. . . but this isn't enough, i havn't reached the word limit so i need more points =] please help