Musk said:
1. The "best engineering faculty" is the best at research not work
2. the high uai only exists not because of its "high standards" but because a very vast majority of stupid students such as yourself believe I good course means a good uai ( lmao Arts is 80+ at USYD, enough said)
3. The person with the greater amount of experience, im working in the industry and they dont give a shit where you came from, they wanna know what can you offer the company.
Your telling me that they want someone from unsw more then someone who has 5 yrs stuctural expierence that went to UWS. Think logically, its like getting a job interview when you were in high school; employers never gave a shit what school you came from.
4. This is Engineering not law, prestige isn't welcomed here.
If you think im full of shit then give me your unis job rates n starting salaries on average as a whole then come back to me
I'm getting tired of idiots that do engineering which listen to what marketing ppl say, fuck you shame me if your an engineer
/rant
mate say what you want, you just cannot hack it.
if you don't have the resources for the research and teaching material, how can you expect to be taught properly? the professors are the ones doing the research AND teaching, you moron.
i made the uni comparison under the circumstance that everything else is the same. you're trying to drag my words out of context. employers never gave a shit where you came from? birrong boys and syd boys, say?
i too, work for a freaken engineering company - reed civil, heard of that? mr i-think-i-know-more-just-because-i-got-industrial-experience.
man, you're the arrogant type that really shits me. there's a reason why a majority of people choose unsw for engineering. use your engineering brain a little.
