Umm principle of relativity (1 Viewer)

stoydgen

Shiftius Curry
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
157
Location
Mount Annan
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
Hey guys just having trouble gettin a concise piece of writing explaining this dot point.

Can anyone sum this one up in a few lines?

Cheers.
 

gordo

Resident Jew
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
Messages
2,352
Location
bondi, sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
the speed of light is constant for all observers regardless of their frame of referrence
 

stoydgen

Shiftius Curry
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
157
Location
Mount Annan
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
lol mee understands now, found a nice summary, thanks for your help aye :D
 

DavidB

New Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2004
Messages
28
stoydgen said:
lol mee understands now, found a nice summary, thanks for your help aye :D
I know your the one tha asked the qn. but u mind sharing the answer with us all boof-head?
 

stoydgen

Shiftius Curry
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
157
Location
Mount Annan
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
Err.. name calling won't get a young mind like yourself anywhere... but to failure unless i post the answer?

Alrighty then anyways basically it is not possible in an inertial frame of reference to detect uniform velocity without referring to another frame of reference.

Happy... Boof head :p
 

Constip8edSkunk

Joga Bonito
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
2,397
Location
Maroubra
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
i believe this dot pt refers more to the galilean relativity originally theorised which einstein built on, ie laws of mechanics applying in all inertial states and that no inertial frame of ref. is more correct than the other etc etc
 

nit

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2004
Messages
833
Location
let's find out.
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Yep, all those forms of relativity are required, because it ends up with the fact that any experiment performed in an inertial FOR will not determine whether that frame is moving or still (without reference to a fixed outside point), and then also the fact that if the aether existed and was stationary in space, then you could perform an experiment that measured the speed of light to determine whether you were moving or not - hence both the definition of relativity as the inability to distinguish between motion and lack of it in an inertial frame, as well as a recourse to the fact that the basic laws of physics (and hence principle of relativity as defined above) hold in inertial frames, are useful.
 

Jase

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
724
Location
Behind You
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Okay so lemme get this straight:

Galilean Relativity
- The laws of mechanics are same for both an observer moving at uniform velocity or at rest.
- No inertial frame of reference of reference is prefered over the other.

Newtonian Relativity
- No mechanical experiment performed wholly within one frame can determine whether that frame is moving with constant velocity or is at rest.

Poincaré's Relativity
- ALL laws of physics are the same for both a frame at rest or a frame in uniform velocity.
- an extension of Newton's relativity

Einstein's Special Relativity
- The laws of physics are the same for all inertial frames of reference.
- The speed of light is constant and is indepedent of the speed of an observer.

Einstein's General Relativity
- The laws of physics are the same for ALL frames of reference, both Inertial and non-intertial

My god there's been alot of relativity throughout the years...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top