• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Guys who only go for model-type girls yet they look crap themselves (2 Viewers)

deviation

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
116
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
but physical attraction is what gets everyone at first.. how can u feel anything for someone if u havent talked to them yet. Initially it comes down to their hot factor!
 

wrong_turn

the chosen one
Joined
Sep 18, 2004
Messages
3,664
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Uni Grad
2010
i know people will give me a rant about this. but refer to the ladder theory.

i reckon its about 30% looks and 60% personality and 10% circumstances
 

ur_inner_child

.%$^!@&^#(*!?.%$^?!.
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
6,084
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
deviation said:
but physical attraction is what gets everyone at first.. how can u feel anything for someone if u havent talked to them yet. Initially it comes down to their hot factor!
yeah. it's the personality that makes the length/quality of the relationship but
 

flipsyde

Shutup!...that's why
Joined
Jul 4, 2004
Messages
1,123
Location
In Utero
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
Its not always looks that first attract you know... cos I make lotsa friends and I talk lots to people and I make new friends through friends at parties and I just start talking to anyone.. I dont care what they look like... then after a bit of a convo.. well sometimes I feel attracted to their personality. I dont go talking to people cos I htink they have potential... not at all... I like making friends and if the convo moves past that then well hey...

So its not really a looks thing for me. At present Im attracted to someone that Ive never met... never seen their face.. a friend whomb Ive only talked to over the phone and also on the net... so...
 

wanton-wonton

Active Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
1,415
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Nope, all you fuckers are wrong. It's all about the looks, no personality whatsoever. Oh and the money too...wealth...you can't go past that.
 

wanton-wonton

Active Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
1,415
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
JKDDragon said:
Keypad is hot shit, I picked him up at a party and he sucked my m00bs all night long.
I have two Christmas wishes for ya.

1) shut up about m00bs.
2) shut up about poo/turd/shit etc.
 

ur_inner_child

.%$^!@&^#(*!?.%$^?!.
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
6,084
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
lesmiester_dj said:
i know people will give me a rant about this. but refer to the ladder theory.

i reckon its about 30% looks and 60% personality and 10% circumstances
Those percentages are not the same as the one in the ladder theory, but okay.

The reason why people will give you a rant about this is because it attempts to explain something that is complicated, different to each individual, subjective, and involves too many variables. It's merely defined what we find attractive in the first part of the relationship. For example the "oh he's hot", "she's got money" and "he has a big penis".

These are all well and good, but the reason why people don't like the ladder theory is that there is much more to the superficial and the motives involved in a relationship.

Each day you are learning about how compatible you are with the person you're with. Each action has a reaction. The way we choose our actions, determine everything afterwards. For example, what we can forgive, how sorry we are, the very words we say etc. Any crisis/event that happens, attraction determines nothing. Personality rules all.

Personality determines all at this point: how you deal with problems, how you deal with your partner's emotions, and how to deal with your own.

Failure to patch things up, forget, or to communicate means the relationship is over, NO MATTER how hot or rich or how much you put out you both think you are

JKDDragon said:
I love you ur_inner_child
I love you too JKD
 

Collin

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
5,084
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
wanton-wonton said:
I have two Christmas wishes for ya.

1) shut up about m00bs.
2) shut up about poo/turd/shit etc.
No.

Haha you got owned.
 

wrong_turn

the chosen one
Joined
Sep 18, 2004
Messages
3,664
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Uni Grad
2010
ur_inner_child said:
Those percentages are not the same as the one in the ladder theory, but okay.

The reason why people will give you a rant about this is because it attempts to explain something that is complicated, different to each individual, subjective, and involves too many variables. It's merely defined what we find attractive in the first part of the relationship. For example the "oh he's hot", "she's got money" and "he has a big penis".

These are all well and good, but the reason why people don't like the ladder theory is that there is much more to the superficial and the motives involved in a relationship.

Each day you are learning about how compatible you are with the person you're with. Each action has a reaction. The way we choose our actions, determine everything afterwards. For example, what we can forgive, how sorry we are, the very words we say etc. Any crisis/event that happens, attraction determines nothing. Personality rules all.

Personality determines all at this point: how you deal with problems, how you deal with your partner's emotions, and how to deal with your own.

Failure to patch things up, forget, or to communicate means the relationship is over, NO MATTER how hot or rich or how much you put out you both think you are



I love you too JKD
woah i got my fair share there. i agree with soem of the concepts of superficiality that is mentioned in the ladder theory. :D
 

Collin

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
5,084
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
lesmiester_dj said:
woah i got my fair share there. i agree with soem of the concepts of superficiality that is mentioned in the ladder theory. :D
I really agreed with the 'I love JKD bit' :)
 
S

Shuter

Guest
ur_inner_child said:
Those percentages are not the same as the one in the ladder theory, but okay.

The reason why people will give you a rant about this is because it attempts to explain something that is complicated, different to each individual, subjective, and involves too many variables. It's merely defined what we find attractive in the first part of the relationship. For example the "oh he's hot", "she's got money" and "he has a big penis".

These are all well and good, but the reason why people don't like the ladder theory is that there is much more to the superficial and the motives involved in a relationship.
Ahh, yes see people must understand that the ladder theory is really defining "how likely you are to have sex withthis person", not how likely a relationship will work.
 

stainmepink

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2004
Messages
676
Gender
Female
HSC
2006
u know what. ive always seen really pretty girls go out with really ugly guys.. but never the other way round. beg to differ anyone?
 

wrong_turn

the chosen one
Joined
Sep 18, 2004
Messages
3,664
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Uni Grad
2010
stainmepink said:
u know what. ive always seen really pretty girls go out with really ugly guys.. but never the other way round. beg to differ anyone?
what do you expect? it's their sugardaddys!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top