MedVision ad

Latest reviews

YOU'RE GENUINELY A LIFESAVER, the highlighting is so good I'm going to start using this format.
thank you so much! these notes are one of the best things my eyes have ever seen
hello i think is very good and wonderful and i appreciate you for putting it out here in the world its comprehensive and organised from the colour coding and how you incorporate the various keys into your text/where/examples of how to since i probably need to practice and this would be a good format i think i would follow i love guidelines thanks you it doesnt hurt to look around to see how people work their structure and style of writing so thank you for sharing plus points since my texts are quite similar/the same to the provided so personally i think itll be useful to me i would 10/10 recommend this to a friend and forward it to my class random fun fact my eng teacher is apparently friends with nam le + named & taped his face to the class plant its called nam leaf thank you again thehscissupersilly i appreciate you a lot
Freaking legend. My notes are all over the place so, this massively helps!
The Propaganda PIP ( response aimed to analyze the use of propaganda in media, but it ultimately missed the mark.

Firstly, the research was superficial. While it touched on key examples, it failed to delve deeply into the psychological effects of propaganda on audiences or the techniques used to manipulate perceptions. A more thorough exploration of case studies would have added significant value.

Additionally, the presentation lacked cohesion. The flow between sections was disjointed, making it difficult to follow the main argument. Visual aids, while present, were not effectively integrated, which detracted from the overall impact of the response.

Furthermore, the analysis of counterarguments was minimal. Addressing opposing views could have strengthened the overall argument and showcased critical thinking skills.

Overall, while the project had potential, it needed more depth and clarity to truly engage with the topic of propaganda effectively.
bcv
bcv
Thank you for the feedback, I appreciate the honesty. Firstly, the research I used clearly stated the techniques used by media to radicalise individuals; echochambers (Chapter 2), fearmongering (Chapter 3), emotional manipulation (Chaper 1/2/3), conspiracy theories (Chaper 3), glorification of radicalised individuals (Chaper 2), etc. these all dived into the psychological effect. Secondly, the presentation lacked cohesion because I intented Chapters 1 to 3 to be their own individual theme and this PIP was made to research a topic, not to argue a point. The visual aids were for my markers. Lastly, my teachers advised me not to address opposing views as it this project was to once again, explore a topic, not argue it. I'm sorry if you felt as though I was not specific or deep enough, it could have been because of the word count restraint. I understand why you do not like this PIP, but giving it one star feels harsh, thank you nonetheless! Have a great day.
I don't do this subject but good👍
bcv
bcv
thanks mate, i appreciate it
My bro did all this work just to study history overseas.
thank you queen i was ignoring international crime -> from a proud international crime hater
enchantedivory27
enchantedivory27
honestly same my teacher saved us
please post the solutions before i crash out
Amazing, extremely helpful thank you so much! saving my star rn lol
hit us up with the solutions if u got them plss
Stepping into the Girraween Mathematics Extension 1 trial of 2024 was like dining at a high-end establishment designed to test the depth of one’s mathematical palate. From the outset, it was clear that this exam aimed not merely to fill intellectual stomachs but to challenge and expand mathematical horizons, much like a multi-course tasting menu that pushes boundaries with each dish.

Questions 11 and 12 were akin to the opening amuse-bouches of a Michelin-starred meal—inviting yet demanding attention to detail. Each question was meticulously crafted, offering a balance of familiar flavors with the occasional twist that left one pondering how best to savor the given mathematical landscape. The algebraic manipulations were subtle yet complex, while the trigonometric inquiries provided an unexpected burst of richness, challenging the depth of one’s analytical skill without overwhelming.

Then came the big questions—these were the main courses, if you will. Each a veritable entrée that tested not only mathematical ability but also stamina, requiring one to chew carefully on every part. Some of the questions required intricate dance moves between calculus and algebra, akin to a perfect pairing of wine and rich red meat, leaving the participant marveling at the layers. It was a slow, methodical feast that both demanded respect and rewarded the patient diner with moments of clarity.

However, the multiple-choice section was something of a conundrum, like the odd dish that doesn’t quite align with the rest of the tasting menu. Where one might expect clarity, refinement, and precision in the choices, some options felt overly ambiguous or even misleading, much like unexpected textures in an otherwise smooth purée. This part of the meal, meant to be digestible and concise, instead introduced some overly complex flavors that could leave one questioning the chef’s intent. In short, while some questions added nuance to the experience, others left a lingering aftertaste that detracted from the elegance of the overall spread.

Ultimately, the Girraween 2024 Mathematics Extension 1 trial served up a satisfying yet challenging mathematical banquet. For those prepared to handle the multiple-choice section's occasional rough edges, it proved a stimulating exercise for the mind, leaving one both exhausted and fulfilled, as any good feast should.
Top